Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38339162›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Ultra-Fast Vitrification: Minimizing the Toxicity of Cryoprotective Agents and Osmotic Stress in Mouse Oocyte Cryopreservation.

Jung-Ran Cho, Eun-Hee Yu, Hyun-Joo Lee, In-Hye Kim, Ji-Hye Jeong, Dan-Bi Lee, Seong-Keun Cho, Jong-Kil Joo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Fabrication and Characterization of Xylomannan/FeInternational journal of fertility & sterility · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jung-Ran ChoInfertility Center of Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 49241, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8425-1979
Eun-Hee YuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Busan 49241, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0249-0467
Hyun-Joo LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Busan 49241, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1223-4387
In-Hye KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Busan 49241, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Hye JeongInfertility Center of Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 49241, Republic of Korea.
Dan-Bi LeeInfertility Center of Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 49241, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Keun ChoLaboratory of Animal Reproductive Physiology & Biotechnology, Department of Animal Science, Pusan National University Graduate School, Miryang 50463, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Kil JooDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Busan 49241, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6338-1512
Pusan National University Hospital · KRPusan National University · KR

Funding

Pusan National University Hospital 202200410001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, women have been adopting oocyte cryopreservation (OC) for fertility preservation for various reasons, such as inevitable gonadotoxic treatment for specific pathologic states and social preferences. While conventional vitrification (C-VIT) has improved the success rate of OC, challenges of possible toxicities of high-concentration cryoprotective agents and osmotic stress persist. To overcome these challenges, we evaluated the ultra-fast vitrification (UF-VIT) method, which reduces the equilibration solution stage exposure time compared to C-VIT by observing mouse oocyte intracellular organelles and embryonic development. Consequently, compared to fresh mouse oocytes, UF-VIT presented significant differences only in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) intensity and mitochondrial (MT) distribution. Meanwhile, C-VIT showed substantial differences in the survival rate, key ER and MT parameters, and embryonic development rate. UF-VIT exhibited considerably fewer negative effects on key MT parameters and resulted in a notably higher blastocyst formation rate than C-VIT. Meiotic spindle (spindle and chromosomes) morphology showed no significant changes between the groups during vitrification/warming (VW), suggesting that VW did not negatively affect the meiotic spindle of the oocytes. In conclusion, UF-VIT seems more effective in OC owing to efficient cytoplasmic water molecule extraction, osmotic stress reduction, and minimization of cell contraction and expansion amplitude, thus compensating for the drawbacks of C-VIT.

Indexed as

Cryoprotective AgentsVitrificationAnimalsCryopreservationFemaleHumansMiceOocytesOsmotic PressureCryoprotective Agentschromosomeendoplasmic reticulummeiotic spindlemitochondriaoocyte cryopreservationultra-fast vitrificationvitrification

Identifiers

PMID38339162
PMCPMC10856457
OpenAlexW4391540061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.