ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Grid-Based Structural and Dimensional Skin Cancer Classification with Self-Featured Optimized Explainable Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- DermaScanAI an explainable hybrid deep learning framework for automated skin lesion classification using dual attention and metadata fusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence for dermatological conditions: a systematic review focused on low- and middle-income countries to address resource constraints and improve access to specialist care.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Review
- Emerging regulatory mechanisms and functions of biomolecular condensates: implications for therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Next-generation approach to skin disorder prediction employing hybrid deep transfer learning.Frontiers in big data · 2025Article
- Human-centered AI as a framework guiding the development of image-based diagnostic tools in oncology: a systematic review.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2024Review
- Special Issue "Machine Learning and Bioinformatics in Human Health and Disease"-Chances and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- AI in dermatology: a comprehensive review into skin cancer detection.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin cancer is a severe and potentially lethal disease, and early detection is critical for successful treatment. Traditional procedures for diagnosing skin cancer are expensive, time-intensive, and necessitate the expertise of a medical practitioner. In recent years, many researchers have developed artificial intelligence (AI) tools, including shallow and deep machine learning-based approaches, to diagnose skin cancer. However, AI-based skin cancer diagnosis faces challenges in complexity, low reproducibility, and explainability. To address these problems, we propose a novel Grid-Based Structural and Dimensional Explainable Deep Convolutional Neural Network for accurate and interpretable skin cancer classification. This model employs adaptive thresholding for extracting the region of interest (ROI), using its dynamic capabilities to enhance the accuracy of identifying cancerous regions. The VGG-16 architecture extracts the hierarchical characteristics of skin lesion images, leveraging its recognized capabilities for deep feature extraction. Our proposed model leverages a grid structure to capture spatial relationships within lesions, while the dimensional features extract relevant information from various image channels. An Adaptive Intelligent Coney Optimization (AICO) algorithm is employed for self-feature selected optimization and fine-tuning the hyperparameters, which dynamically adapts the model architecture to optimize feature extraction and classification. The model was trained and tested using the ISIC dataset of 10,015 dermascope images and the MNIST dataset of 2357 images of malignant and benign oncological diseases. The experimental results demonstrated that the model achieved accuracy and CSI values of 0.96 and 0.97 for TP 80 using the ISIC dataset, which is 17.70% and 16.49% more than lightweight CNN, 20.83% and 19.59% more than DenseNet, 18.75% and 17.53% more than CNN, 6.25% and 6.18% more than Efficient Net-B0, 5.21% and 5.15% over ECNN, 2.08% and 2.06% over COA-CAN, and 5.21% and 5.15% more than ARO-ECNN. Additionally, the AICO self-feature selected ECNN model exhibited minimal FPR and FNR of 0.03 and 0.02, respectively. The model attained a loss of 0.09 for ISIC and 0.18 for the MNIST dataset, indicating that the model proposed in this research outperforms existing techniques. The proposed model improves accuracy, interpretability, and robustness for skin cancer classification, ultimately aiding clinicians in early diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.