Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38338599›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Alternative Additives for Organic and Natural Ready-to-Eat Meats to Control Spoilage and Maintain Shelf Life: Current Perspectives in the United States.

Aaron R Bodie, Lindsey A Wythe, Dana K Dittoe, Michael J Rothrock, Corliss A O'Bryan, Steven C Ricke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aaron R BodieDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Lindsey A WytheDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
Dana K DittoeDepartment of Animal Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5517-5794
Michael J RothrockEgg Safety and Quality Research Unit, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture-Agriculture Research Service (USDA-ARS), Athens, GA 30605, USA.
Corliss A O'BryanDepartment of Food Science, University of Arkansas-Fayetteville, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-7751
Steven C RickeDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3584-9915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food additives are employed in the food industry to enhance the color, smell, and taste of foods, increase nutritional value, boost processing efficiency, and extend shelf life. Consumers are beginning to prioritize food ingredients that they perceive as supporting a healthy lifestyle, emphasizing ingredients they deem acceptable as alternative or "clean-label" ingredients. Ready-to-eat (RTE) meat products can be contaminated with pathogens and spoilage microorganisms after the cooking step, contributing to food spoilage losses and increasing the risk to consumers for foodborne illnesses. More recently, consumers have advocated for no artificial additives or preservatives, which has led to a search for antimicrobials that meet these demands but do not lessen the safety or quality of RTE meats. Lactates and diacetates are used almost universally to extend the shelf life of RTE meats by reducing spoilage organisms and preventing the outgrowth of the foodborne pathogen

Indexed as

alternative additivesantimicrobialsclean-labelRTE foodsspoilage

Identifiers

PMID38338599
PMCPMC10855140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.