Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38338248›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Inclusive Framework for Collaboration between Midwives and Traditional Birth Attendants and Optimising Maternal and Child Healthcare in Restricted Rural Communities in South Africa: Policy Considerations.

Maurine Rofhiwa Musie, Fhumulani Mavis Mulaudzi, Rafiat Anokwuru, Nombulelo Veronica Sepeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maurine Rofhiwa MusieDepartment of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0084, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9572-6319
Fhumulani Mavis MulaudziDepartment of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0084, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5144-0266
Rafiat AnokwuruDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, llishan School of Nursing, Babcock University Remo, Ilishan-Remo 121003, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0001-8565-6305
Nombulelo Veronica SepengDepartment of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0084, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9394-557X

Funding

National Research Foundation Black Academic Advancement Programme (BAAP) grant no 129428.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaboration between midwives and traditional birth attendants for maternal and child healthcare is a challenge in rural South African communities due to the absence of a guiding framework. To address this, this study sought to develop and validate an inclusive framework informed by the Donabedian structure-process-outcome (SPO) framework for collaboration between these healthcare professionals.

methodKey stakeholders were invited to participate in a co-creation workshop to develop the framework. Twenty (20) participants were purposively sampled based on their maternal and child healthcare expertise. A consensus design using the nominal group technique was followed.

resultsParticipants identified the components needed in the framework, encompassing (i) objectives, (ii) structures, (iii) processes, and (iv) outcomes.

conclusionThis paper will contribute to the development of an inclusive healthcare framework, providing insights for stakeholders, policymakers, and practitioners seeking to improve maternal and child healthcare outcomes in resource-constrained, rural settings. Ultimately, the proposed framework will create a sustainable and culturally sensitive model that optimises the strengths of midwives and TBAs and fosters improved healthcare delivery to rural South African communities.

Indexed as

collaborationframeworkmidwivesnominal group techniquestakeholder engagementtraditional birth attendant

Identifiers

PMID38338248
PMCPMC10855344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.