Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38338168›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

A Survey of Public Opinion on Community Cats' General Health and Relationship Quality with Residents in Urban China.

Xuan Gu, Zilin Zhang, Guo Peng, Anru Ni, Bo Wang, Xiufan Xiong, Yujie Liu, Li Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xuan GuDepartment of Social Work, School of Philosophy and Social Development, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3966-8844
Zilin ZhangCenter for Animal Protection Studies, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.ORCID 0009-0004-1279-8379
Guo PengCenter for Animal Protection Studies, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.
Anru NiDepartment of Social Work, School of Philosophy and Social Development, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.
Bo WangCenter for Animal Protection Studies, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.
Xiufan XiongDepartment of Social Work, School of Philosophy and Social Development, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.
Yujie LiuDepartment of Social Work, School of Philosophy and Social Development, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.
Li WangDepartment of Social Work, School of Philosophy and Social Development, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.

Funding

Beijing Ta Foundation for Animal Protection NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management and coexistence of community cats in urban areas is a growing concern amid global urbanization. Through a survey-based investigation, we examine the residents' perceptions of the general health of community cats and human-cat relationships in urban China. The data from 5382 participants revealed that approximately 70% of participants perceived community cats as being in good health, and 60% reported harmonious or non-conflict coexistence between residents and these cats. Around 45% of the participants rescued or helped community cats, 38% expressed their intention to adopt, and 18% complained about the issues of community cats to management staff. Linear, logistic, and multilevel-logistic regressions were employed to examine the associations between the types of cities and communities or the participants' socio-demographics and the perceived well-being of community cats or human-cat relationships. The results show that the cats in fourth-tier cities (e.g., county-level cities) had poorer living conditions than in first-tier cities (e.g., Beijing), while the cats in urban village communities (e.g., villages in the city) were less likely to exhibit good health than in ordinary commercial housing communities. The results also show that socio-demographic variables, such as educational attainment, marital status, and income level, predicted participants' relationships with community cats. This study is the first of its kind. It provides valuable insights for stakeholders to develop effective policies and interventions on cat management, emphasizing the need for tailored strategies in diverse urban settings and populations.

Indexed as

animal welfareChinacommunity catfree-roaming catshuman-animal relationshipstray catunowned caturban ecology

Identifiers

PMID38338168
PMCPMC10854670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.