ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024
Improved Equine Fecal Microbiome Characterization Using Target Enrichment by Hybridization Capture.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut Microbiota as a Molecular Regulator of Mineral Homeostasis in Horses: Mechanisms and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Effects of probiotic formulations on gastrointestinal tract morphological changes and gut microbiota in Hu lambs.Open veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Gut Microbiota of Ruminants and Monogastric Livestock: An Overview.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
GITDs are among the most common causes of death in adult and young horses in the United States (US). Previous studies have indicated a connection between GITDs and the equine gut microbiome. However, the low taxonomic resolution of the current microbiome sequencing methods has hampered the identification of specific bacterial changes associated with GITDs in horses. Here, we have compared TEHC, a new approach for 16S rRNA gene selection and sequencing, with conventional 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing for the characterization of the equine fecal microbiome. Both sequencing approaches were used to determine the fecal microbiome of four adult horses and one commercial mock microbiome. Our results show that TEHC yielded significantly more operational taxonomic units (OTUs) than conventional 16S amplicon sequencing when the same number of reads were used in the analysis. This translated into a deeper and more accurate characterization of the fecal microbiome when the samples were sequenced with TEHC according to the relative abundance analysis. Alpha and beta diversity metrics corroborated these findings and demonstrated that the microbiome of the fecal samples was significantly richer when sequenced with TEHC compared to 16S amplicon sequencing. Altogether, our study suggests that the TEHC strategy provides a more extensive characterization of the fecal microbiome of horses than the current alternative based on the PCR amplification of a portion of the 16S rRNA gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.