Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38338080›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Advances in Methane Emission Estimation in Livestock: A Review of Data Collection Methods, Model Development and the Role of AI Technologies.

Jalil Ghassemi Nejad, Mun-Su Ju, Jang-Hoon Jo, Kyung-Hwan Oh, Yoon-Seok Lee, Sung-Dae Lee, Eun-Joong Kim, Sanggun Roh, Hong-Gu Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jalil Ghassemi NejadDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6578-8829
Mun-Su JuDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4387-554X
Jang-Hoon JoDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8153-7165
Kyung-Hwan OhDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0001-9413-053X
Yoon-Seok LeeSchool of Biotechnology, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4803-5192
Sung-Dae LeeAnimal Nutrition and Physiology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9167-4099
Eun-Joong KimDepartment of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University, Sangju 37224, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5962-6994
Sanggun RohGraduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1092-5691
Hong-Gu LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0679-5663
Konkuk University · KRHankyong National University · KRKyungpook National University · KRRural Development Administration · KRTohoku University · JP

Funding

Rural Development Administration 1395077915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review examines the significant role of methane emissions in the livestock industry, with a focus on cattle and their substantial impact on climate change. It highlights the importance of accurate measurement and management techniques for methane, a potent greenhouse gas accounting for 14-16% of global emissions. The study evaluates both conventional and AI-driven methods for detecting methane emissions from livestock, particularly emphasizing cattle contributions, and the need for region-specific formulas. Sections cover livestock methane emissions, the potential of AI technology, data collection issues, methane's significance in carbon credit schemes, and current research and innovation. The review emphasizes the critical role of accurate measurement and estimation methods for effective climate change mitigation and reducing methane emissions from livestock operations. Overall, it provides a comprehensive overview of methane emissions in the livestock industry by synthesizing existing research and literature, aiming to improve knowledge and methods for mitigating climate change. Livestock-generated methane, especially from cattle, is highlighted as a crucial factor in climate change, and the review underscores the importance of integrating precise measurement and estimation techniques for effective mitigation.

Indexed as

methane emission estimationmodel making and AI technologies

Identifiers

PMID38338080
PMCPMC10854801
OpenAlexW4391308268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.