Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38337838›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Estrogen Receptor (ER) and Progesterone Receptor (PgR) Expression in Endometrial Cancer-An Immunohistochemical Assessment.

Stanisław Przewoźny, Jan Rogaliński, Mateusz de Mezer, Anna Markowska, Janina Markowska, Jakub Żurawski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Characterization of SUSD3 as a novel prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. circRNAs in Endometrial Cancer-A Promising Biomarker: State of the Art.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stanisław PrzewoźnyDepartment of Immunobiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Rokietnicka 8, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3268-4764
Jan RogalińskiDepartment of Immunobiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Rokietnicka 8, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7452-901X
Mateusz de MezerDepartment of Immunobiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Rokietnicka 8, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4718-9747
Anna MarkowskaDepartment of Perinatology and Women's Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Polna 33, 60-535 Poznan, Poland.
Janina MarkowskaGynecological Oncology Center, Poznańska 58A, 60-850 Poznan, Poland.
Jakub ŻurawskiDepartment of Immunobiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Rokietnicka 8, 60-806 Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5838-0451
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLGreater Poland Cancer Center · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common types of cancer in Poland and worldwide. Many risk factors lead to the pathogenesis of this disease, such as lifestyle choices, BMI, the medicines used in breast cancer therapy, and Lynch syndrome. EC cells show the expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) and progesterone receptors (PgR). These receptors occur in multiple isoforms and have a significant influence on the operation of cells. The loss of ER and PgR expression is associated with a poor prognosis. We assessed tissue slides that were obtained from 103 women with EC diagnoses of various grades, stages, and histological types. In this study, we used computer image analyses to increase the objectivity of the assessment. We proved that, in the tissue of patients with high-grade (G3) EC, the expression of PgR is significantly lower than that in the tissues of patients with low-grade EC. We also observed that PgR is significantly expressed in EC with a low FIGO stage and in the endometroid type of EC (which rarely becomes malignant compared to serous type). The expression of ERb1 was lower in patients with EC at the IV FIGO stage than in patients with stage III EC. These findings confirm that the loss of ER and PgR expression is connected with a poor prognosis.

Indexed as

computer image analysisendometrial cancerestrogen receptorprogesterone receptor

Identifiers

PMID38337838
PMCPMC10855223
OpenAlexW4391430823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.