Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38337832›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Feasibility of Tear Meniscus Height Measurements Obtained with a Smartphone-Attachable Portable Device and Agreement of the Results with Standard Slit Lamp Examination.

Massimiliano Borselli, Mario Damiano Toro, Costanza Rossi, Andrea Taloni, Rohan Khemlani, Shintato Nakayama, Hiroki Nishimura, Eisuke Shimizu, Vincenzo Scorcia, Giuseppe Giannaccare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Novel Noninvasive Screening Tool for Dry Eye Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Massimiliano BorselliDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5262-9765
Mario Damiano ToroDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federico II University Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7152-2613
Costanza RossiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Andrea TaloniDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Rohan KhemlaniOUI Inc., Tokyo 160-0022, Japan.
Shintato NakayamaOUI Inc., Tokyo 160-0022, Japan.
Hiroki NishimuraOUI Inc., Tokyo 160-0022, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-2832-4934
Eisuke ShimizuOUI Inc., Tokyo 160-0022, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3422-8578
Vincenzo ScorciaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6826-7957
Giuseppe GiannaccareEye Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2617-0289

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using a novel device, the Smart Eye Camera (SEC), for assessing tear meniscus height (TMH) after fluorescein staining and the agreement of the results with measurements obtained using standard slit lamp examination.

methodsTMH was assessed using both SEC and conventional slit lamp examination. The images were analyzed using the software ImageJ 1.53t (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). A common measurement unit scale was established based on a paper strip, which was used as a calibration marker to convert pixels into metric scale. A color threshold was applied using uniform parameters for brightness, saturation, and hue. The images were then binarized to black and white to enhance the representation of the tear menisci. A 2 mm area around the upper and lower meniscus in the central eye lid zone was selected and magnified 3200 times to facilitate manual measurement. The values obtained using SEC were compared with those obtained with a slit lamp.

resultsThe upper and lower TMH values measured using the SEC were not statistically different from those obtained with a slit lamp (0.209 ± 0.073 mm vs. 0.235 ± 0.085,

conclusionsThe SEC demonstrated sufficient validity and reliability for assessing TMH in healthy eyes in a clinical setting, demonstrating concordance with the conventional slit lamp examination.

Indexed as

fluorescein stainingslit lampsmart eye camerasmartphonetear meniscus height

Identifiers

PMID38337832
PMCPMC10855891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.