Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38337815›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Proposed Framework for Conducting Clinically Relevant Translational Biomarker Research for the Diagnosis, Prognosis and Management of Sepsis.

François Ventura, Gilbert Greub, W Conrad Liles, Shevin T Jacob

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

François VenturaDivision of Anesthesiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0443-372X
Gilbert GreubMedical Microbiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9529-3317
W Conrad LilesSepsis Center of Research Excellence, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-6420, USA.
Shevin T JacobDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2425-9394
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the diagnosis of sepsis requires the identification of the three components of infection, a systemic inflammation response, and organ dysfunction, there is currently no consensus on gold-standard criteria. There are however suggested tools and tests, which have been proposed in international guidelines, including those produced by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Biomarkers play an important role in these tools and tests, and numerous heterogeneous studies have been performed to evaluate their respective clinical utility. Our review of the current practice shows that no biomarkers of infection, systemic inflammation response, organ dysfunction and sepsis are currently specifically recommended, which is probably due to the lack of standardization of studies. We therefore propose to define a framework for conducting clinically relevant translational biomarker research and seek to establish ideal criteria that can be applied to an infection, systemic inflammation response, organ dysfunction and sepsis biomarkers, which can enable early screening of sepsis, diagnosis of sepsis at the time of clinical suspicion and monitoring of sepsis treatment efficacy.

Indexed as

antibioticsantimicrobial resistancebiomarkerinfectionorgan dysfunctionorgan failuresepsisseptic shocksystemic inflammation response

Identifiers

PMID38337815
PMCPMC10855655
OpenAlexW4391375422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.