ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Cardiac Fibrosis Automated Diagnosis Based on FibrosisNet Network Using CMR Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adaptive multi-feature fusion architecture with optimized learning for high-fidelity brain tumor classification in MRI.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Translating Mechanistic Insights Into Action and Revealing New Pathways: Machine Learning Approaches in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- Rewiring the scar: translational advances in cardiac fibrosis.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2025Review
- AI Applied to Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Precision Medicine in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic heart condition is one of the most prevalent causes of death that can be treated more effectively and lead to fewer fatalities if identified early. Heart muscle fibrosis affects the diastolic and systolic function of the heart and is linked to unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) scarring, a risk factor for ischemic heart disease, may be accurately identified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to recognize fibrosis. In the past few decades, numerous methods based on MRI have been employed to identify and categorize cardiac fibrosis. Because they increase the therapeutic advantages and the likelihood that patients will survive, developing these approaches is essential and has significant medical benefits. A brand-new method that uses MRI has been suggested to help with diagnosing. Advances in deep learning (DL) networks contribute to the early and accurate diagnosis of heart muscle fibrosis. This study introduces a new deep network known as FibrosisNet, which detects and classifies fibrosis if it is present. It includes some of 17 various series layers to achieve the fibrosis detection target. The introduced classification system is trained and evaluated for the best performance results. In addition, deep transfer-learning models are applied to the different famous convolution neural networks to find fibrosis detection architectures. The FibrosisNet architecture achieves an accuracy of 96.05%, a sensitivity of 97.56%, and an F1-Score of 96.54%. The experimental results show that FibrosisNet has numerous benefits and produces higher results than current state-of-the-art methods and other advanced CNN approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.