Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38337580›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Effect of Customized and Prefabricated Healing Abutments on Peri-Implant Soft Tissue and Bone in Immediate Implant Sites: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Parima Chokaree, Pongsakorn Poovarodom, Pisaisit Chaijareenont, Pimduen Rungsiyakull

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07031232 (Assessment of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Modifications Following the Use of Customized Healing Abutments on Subcrestally Placed Implants), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07031232 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Modifications Following the Use of Customized Healing Abutments on Subcrestally Placed Implants

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ValenciaRan2025 to 2029Enrolled75ConditionsPeri-implant Soft Tissue Healing, Soft Tissue Management in Subcrestal Dental Implants, Healing Abutment Influence on Gingival VolumeArmsBone-Level Implant Placement with Transmucosal Abutment and One Abutment-One Time Protocol Using Healing Abutments
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Parima ChokareeDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Pongsakorn PoovarodomDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Pisaisit ChaijareenontDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Pimduen RungsiyakullDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7497-6618
Chiang Mai University · TH

Funding

Chiang Mai University RG40/2566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of customized healing abutments compared to prefabricated healing abutments in immediate implant sites. Twelve patients requiring single immediate implant placement were divided into two groups: a prefabricated group received prefabricated titanium healing abutments, and a customized group received a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) customized healing abutments fabricated based on the individuals' digital impressions. Outcomes, including peri-implant horizontal and vertical soft tissue alteration, bone level change, volume change, pain score, and pink esthetic score (PES) change, were evaluated at the 1-, 4-, and 6-month follow-ups compared to pre-extraction teeth. At the 1- and 4-month follow-ups, the customized group had a significantly lower buccal volume variation (BVv). At the 6-month follow-up, neither group showed any significant difference in the marginal bone change; however, the customized group had a significantly lower PES change and a lower pain score. In the anterior and premolar regions, the customized group showed the preservation of peri-implant buccal horizontal soft tissue and buccal volume, while in the molar regions, the preservation of papilla height and midfacial height was observed. The morphology of the customized healing abutment demonstrated a better trend in preservation of peri-implant soft tissue, esthetic outcomes, and lower patient discomfort in immediate implant sites.

Indexed as

customized healing abutmentdental implantimmediate implant

Identifiers

PMID38337580
PMCPMC10856257
OpenAlexW4391470661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.