Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38337468›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Living-Donor Uterus Transplantation: A Clinical Review.

Massimiliano Veroux, Paolo Scollo, Martina Maria Giambra, Giuseppe Roscitano, Alessia Giaquinta, Francesco Setacci, Pierfrancesco Veroux

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Anesthesia for uterine transplantation.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Availability of deceased uterus donor: Is it a real case scenario in Spain?Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Massimiliano VerouxVascular Surgery and Organ Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2780-6421
Paolo ScolloMaternal and Child Department, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cannizzaro Hospital, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6275-7488
Martina Maria GiambraVascular Surgery and Organ Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9911-5227
Giuseppe RoscitanoVascular Surgery and Organ Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Alessia GiaquintaVascular Surgery and Organ Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Francesco SetacciVascular Surgery and Organ Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Pierfrancesco VerouxVascular Surgery and Organ Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
University of Catania · ITOspedale Cannizzaro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterus transplantation (UTx) is currently the only available treatment for absolute uterine factor infertility. More than 90 uterus transplantations have been performed worldwide, mostly from living donors. Living-donor (LD) UTx is a challenging surgical procedure since it poses ethical issues, and it is a high-risk and invasive surgery with higher hysterectomy-related risks compared to conventional hysterectomy. A total of 59 living-donor hysterectomies have been reported in the literature, including 35 performed with a laparotomic approach, 20 with a robotic approach and 4 with a laparoscopic approach. The mean donor age was 45.6 ± 9.1 years, and 22 were unrelated with the recipients, 34 were emotionally related (27 mothers, 5 sisters, 2 mother's sisters). The mean recipient age was 28.8 ± 4.5 years. Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome was the most common indication for uterus transplant. Robotic living-donor hysterectomy had the longest operative time but resulted in a lower blood loss and postoperative stay compared to laparotomic and laparoscopic approaches. Twenty-nine births from LD-UTx have been reported, four after robotic living-donor hysterectomy and twenty-five after a laparotomic procedure. UTx is now an effective treatment for women with UFI. While living-donor UTx in some cases may be considered an experimental procedure, it offers the extraordinary possibility to give women the opportunity to have a pregnancy. Many efforts should be made to reduce the potential risks for donors, including the use of mini-invasive techniques, and the efficacy of UTx in the recipients, giving the potential harm of immunosuppression in a recipient of a non-life-saving organ.

Indexed as

deceased donorhysterectomylaparoscopiclive birthsMayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndromerobotic

Identifiers

PMID38337468
PMCPMC10856556
OpenAlexW4391345145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.