Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38337464›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Comparison of the Analgesic Efficacy between Levobupivacaine 0.25% and Ropivacaine 0.375% for PENG (Pericapsular Nerve Group) Block in the Context of Hip Fracture Surgery of Elderly Patients: A Single-Center, Randomized, and Controlled Clinical Trial.

Daniel Salgado-García, Agustín Díaz-Álvarez, José Luis González-Rodríguez, María Rocío López-Iglesias, Eduardo Sánchez-López, Manuel Jesús Sánchez-Ledesma, María Isabel Martínez-Trufero

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04773301 (Randomized and Controlled Phase IV Clinical Trial on the Analgesic Effectiveness of the Combined Blockade in the Hip Fractures of the Elderly), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04773301 phase4completednot on this map

Randomized and Controlled Phase IV Clinical Trial on the Analgesic Effectiveness of the Combined Blockade in the Hip Fractures of the Elderly: Comparative Study Between Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundación Instituto de Estudios de Ciencias de la Salud de Castilla y LeónRan2021 to 2021Enrolled114ConditionsHip FracturesArmsLevobupivacaine, Ropivacaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Salgado-GarcíaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Salamanca University Hospital, Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León (SACYL), Paseo de la Transición Española, 37007 Salamanca, Castilla y León, Spain.ORCID 0009-0009-5602-0960
Agustín Díaz-ÁlvarezDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Salamanca University Hospital, Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León (SACYL), Paseo de la Transición Española, 37007 Salamanca, Castilla y León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6229-8311
José Luis González-RodríguezDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Salamanca University Hospital, Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León (SACYL), Paseo de la Transición Española, 37007 Salamanca, Castilla y León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8059-1805
María Rocío López-IglesiasDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Salamanca University Hospital, Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León (SACYL), Paseo de la Transición Española, 37007 Salamanca, Castilla y León, Spain.
Eduardo Sánchez-LópezDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Salamanca University Hospital, Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León (SACYL), Paseo de la Transición Española, 37007 Salamanca, Castilla y León, Spain.
Manuel Jesús Sánchez-LedesmaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Salamanca University Hospital, Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León (SACYL), Paseo de la Transición Española, 37007 Salamanca, Castilla y León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4727-2404
María Isabel Martínez-TruferoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Salamanca University Hospital, Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y León (SACYL), Paseo de la Transición Española, 37007 Salamanca, Castilla y León, Spain.
Instituto de Estudios de Ciencias de la Salud de Castilla y León · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have compared levobupivacaine versus ropivacaine in various peripheral nerve blocks in terms of block duration, quality of analgesia, and onset time, but this has not occurred in the PENG block. Here, a single-center, randomized, and controlled clinical trial is presented. One hundred and twenty patients older than 65 years suffering from hip fractures and surgically treated at our institution under spinal anesthesia were eligible for participation; of them, one hundred and eight were analyzed. Patients were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided PENG blocks using 20 mL of either 0.25% levobupivacaine or 0.375% ropivacaine (both of which are equipotent concentrations). The primary endpoint was to compare the analgesic duration (time to first rescue) and analgesic quality (pain scores using the VAS, PAINAD, and AlgoPlus scales) between the groups. Secondary endpoints included comparing the onset time, describing the need for and type of rescue analgesics, and possible associated adverse effects. There were no statistically significant differences in analgesic duration between levobupivacaine (median 861.0, IQR 960) and ropivacaine (median 1205.0, IQR 1379;

Indexed as

frail elderlyhip fractureslevobupivacainenerve blockpain managementpain measurementpain postoperativeropivacaineultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38337464
PMCPMC10856763
OpenAlexW4391345245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.