Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38337393›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Custom CAD/CAM Peek Implants for Complex Orbitocranial Reconstruction: Our Experience with 15 Patients.

Cristina Cárdenas-Serres, Fernando Almeida-Parra, Anna María Simón-Flors, Patricia de Leyva-Moreno, Álvaro Ranz-Colio, Luis Ley-Urzaiz, Julio Acero-Sanz

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontotemporal-orbitozygomatic approach for pediatric cranio-orbital tumors: a single-center experience.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cristina Cárdenas-SerresDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Fernando Almeida-ParraDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Anna María Simón-FlorsDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Patricia de Leyva-MorenoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Álvaro Ranz-ColioDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Luis Ley-UrzaizDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Julio Acero-SanzDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS, 28034 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0811-1368
Instituto Cajal · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone defects within the cranio-orbital complex present unique challenges in terms of surgical planning and reconstruction. This article presents a novel approach using PEEK material and advanced surgical technologies to address these challenges. A retrospective analysis of 15 patients who underwent craniofacial reconstruction using patient-specific polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants between 2016 and 2021 was carried out. Comprehensive preoperative planning was performed, utilizing advanced imaging techniques and specialized software for virtual surgical planning. Patient-specific PEEK PSIs were designed and manufactured based on the preoperative plan. Intraoperative navigation was used to guide the surgical procedure, enabling precise osteotomy and optimal implant placement. This article describes the step-by-step process and the tools utilized in each phase. The etiologies were as follows: meningioma in seven cases, benign lesions in five cases, malignant tumors in two cases, and trauma sequelae in one case. In all cases, 3D-printed PEEK implants were utilized to achieve precise reconstruction. No major complications were described. In one case, an implant replacement was needed with successful outcomes. Our study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of using PEEK patient-specific implants for personalized craniofacial reconstruction. The combination of advanced imaging, virtual planning, and CAD-CAM technology contributes to improved surgical outcomes in terms of oncologic margin control, functional restoration, and aesthetic results.

Indexed as

bone defectscranio-orbital complexintraoperative navigationosteotomypatient-specific implantsPEEKreconstructionvirtual surgical planning

Identifiers

PMID38337393
PMCPMC10856719
OpenAlexW4391216367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.