Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38337138›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2024

Exploring the impact of optical corrections on visual functions in myopia control-a scoping review.

Salai Dhavamathi Janarthanan, Kaleem Samiyullah, Gopinath Madheswaran, Shonraj Ballae Ganeshrao, Kathleen Watt

Open access · hybridAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Impact of Myopia Control Spectacle Lens Designs on Visual Function.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Salai Dhavamathi JanarthananDepartment of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. dhavamathi.j@manipal.edu.
Kaleem SamiyullahDepartment of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Gopinath MadheswaranAcchutha Eye Care & Institute of Optometry, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.
Shonraj Ballae GaneshraoDepartment of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Kathleen WattSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Univeristy of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · INAustralian College of Optometry · AUVasan Eye Care Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMyopia is controlled optically with peripheral defocus spectacles, multifocal contact lenses, or orthokeratology lenses. However, it is unknown which optical correction will improve visual performance. This scoping review aimed to identify and summarize studies on various visual functions using optical corrections for myopia control.

methodsTo develop the search strategy, population (Myopia), concept (visual performance), and context (unrestricted race/region) were used. PubMed, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched using the keywords myopia, contrast sensitivity, high and low contrast visual acuity, stereopsis, and optical correction of myopia control. This scoping review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework registry and followed the framework for scoping review outlined by the Joanna Briggs Institute.

resultsEight studies (n = 8) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Four were conducted in Europe, two were conducted in China, and one was conducted in Japan and Singapore. Five studies were randomized controlled trials, out of which three used contact lenses and two studies used peripheral defocus spectacles lenses. Studies ranged from one day to 2 years. Three studies that used orthokeratology lenses were prospective study designs. Among the studies that used orthokeratology lenses and contact lenses, two studies measured the contrast sensitivity function with CSV1000 (Vector Vision) under mesopic and photopic conditions, with and without glare. Two studies measured the central and peripheral contrast sensitivity using psychophysics experiments. High and low contrast visual acuity was measured using the Freiburg Vision Test (n = 1) and ETDRS charts (n = 3), and stereopsis was assessed using a random dot stereogram (n = 1). The studies showed a reduction in central and peripheral contrast sensitivity function and low contrast acuity when treated with multifocal contact lenses, orthokeratology lenses, and peripheral defocus lenses compared with single-vision lenses.

conclusionThis scoping review found a reduction in central and peripheral contrast sensitivity function, as well as low contrast visual acuity when using various optical corrections for myopia control, while high-contrast visual acuity remained the same. The impact of visual functions may not influence the effectiveness of myopia control. Eye care practitioners should provide awareness to the parent and patient population about the potential visual impact of recent designs for optical corrections of myopia control.

Indexed as

Contact LensesEyeglassesMyopiaOrthokeratologic ProceduresVisual AcuityContrast SensitivityHumansRefraction, OcularContrast sensitivity functionHigh-contrast visual acuityLow contrast visual acuityMultifocal contact lensOrthokeratology lensesPeripheral defocus spectaclesScoping review

Identifiers

PMID38337138
PMCPMC10858094
OpenAlexW4391677839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.