Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38337048›Full record

SynthesisNature ecology & evolution2024

Meta-analysis shows that wild large herbivores shape ecosystem properties and promote spatial heterogeneity.

Jonas Trepel, Elizabeth le Roux, Andrew J Abraham, Robert Buitenwerf, Johannes Kamp, Jeppe A Kristensen, Melanie Tietje, Erick J Lundgren, Jens-Christian Svenning

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Reevaluating introduced herbivores in conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. European challenges.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Space-use by feral cattle and horses shapes vegetation structure in a trophic rewilding area.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonas TrepelCenter for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark. jonas.trepel@bio.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7358-9204
Elizabeth le RouxCenter for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8468-8284
Andrew J AbrahamCenter for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Robert BuitenwerfCenter for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3356-2301
Johannes KampDepartment of Conservation Biology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8313-6979
Jeppe A KristensenCenter for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Melanie TietjeSection for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Erick J LundgrenCenter for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark. erick.lundgren@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9893-3324
Jens-Christian SvenningCenter for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3415-0862

Funding

Carlsbergfondet (Carlsberg Foundation) CF20-0238Danmarks Grundforskningsfond (Danish National Research Foundation) DNRF173Det Frie Forskningsråd (Danish Council for Independent Research) 0135-00225BDet Frie Forskningsråd (Danish Council for Independent Research) 1131-00006BEC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101062339Villum Fonden (Villum Foundation) 16549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Megafauna (animals ≥45 kg) have probably shaped the Earth's terrestrial ecosystems for millions of years with pronounced impacts on biogeochemistry, vegetation, ecological communities and evolutionary processes. However, a quantitative global synthesis on the generality of megafauna effects on ecosystems is lacking. Here we conducted a meta-analysis of 297 studies and 5,990 individual observations across six continents to determine how wild herbivorous megafauna influence ecosystem structure, ecological processes and spatial heterogeneity, and whether these impacts depend on body size and environmental factors. Despite large variability in megafauna effects, we show that megafauna significantly alter soil nutrient availability, promote open vegetation structure and reduce the abundance of smaller animals. Other responses (14 out of 26), including, for example, soil carbon, were not significantly affected. Further, megafauna significantly increase ecosystem heterogeneity by affecting spatial heterogeneity in vegetation structure and the abundance and diversity of smaller animals. Given that spatial heterogeneity is considered an important driver of biodiversity across taxonomic groups and scales, these results support the hypothesis that megafauna may promote biodiversity at large scales. Megafauna declined precipitously in diversity and abundance since the late Pleistocene, and our results indicate that their restoration would substantially influence Earth's terrestrial ecosystems.

Indexed as

EcosystemHerbivoryAnimalsBiodiversityBiological EvolutionSoilSoil

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.