Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38337044›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2024

Primary and secondary care service use and costs associated with frailty in an ageing population: longitudinal analysis of an English primary care cohort of adults aged 50 and over, 2006-2017.

Carole Fogg, Tracey England, Shihua Zhu, Jeremy Jones, Simon de Lusignan, Simon D S Fraser, Paul Roderick, Andy Clegg, Scott Harris, Sally Brailsford and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Carole FoggSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3000-6185
Tracey EnglandSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7565-4189
Shihua ZhuSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Jeremy JonesSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Simon de LusignanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Simon D S FraserSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Paul RoderickSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Andy CleggAcademic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Scott HarrisSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Sally BrailsfordSouthampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6665-8230
Abigail BarkhamSouthern Health NHS Foundation Trust, Unit 1 Wessex Way, Colden Common, Winchester SO21 1WP, UK.
Harnish P PatelUniversity Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Bronagh WalshSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research (HSDR) HS&DR 16/116/43UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrailty becomes more prevalent and healthcare needs increase with age. Information on the impact of frailty on population level use of health services and associated costs is needed to plan for ageing populations.

aimTo describe primary and secondary care service use and associated costs by electronic Frailty Index (eFI) category. DESIGN AND

settingRetrospective cohort using electronic health records. Participants aged ≥50 registered in primary care practices contributing to the Oxford Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre, 2006-2017.

methodsPrimary and secondary care use (totals and means) were stratified by eFI category and age group. Standardised 2017 costs were used to calculate primary, secondary and overall costs. Generalised linear models explored associations between frailty, sociodemographic characteristics. Adjusted mean costs and cost ratios were produced.

resultsIndividual mean annual use of primary and secondary care services increased with increasing frailty severity. Overall cohort care costs for were highest in mild frailty in all 12 years, followed by moderate and severe, although the proportion of the population with severe frailty can be expected to increase over time. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, compared to the fit category, individual annual costs doubled in mild frailty, tripled in moderate and quadrupled in severe.

conclusionsIncreasing levels of frailty are associated with an additional burden of individual service use. However, individuals with mild and moderate frailty contribute to higher overall costs. Earlier intervention may have the most potential to reduce service use and costs at population level.

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedAgingFrail ElderlyHumansMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesSecondary Health Carefrailtyhealth care costsolder peopleprimary health caresecondary health care

Identifiers

PMID38337044
PMCPMC10857897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.