Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38337041›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2024

Postnatal growth and neurodevelopment at 2 years' corrected age in extremely low birthweight infants.

David A Nyakotey, Angelica M Clarke, Barbara E Cormack, Frank H Bloomfield, Jane E Harding, ProVIDe Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Nutrition assessment of hospitalized very preterm infants: Best practices for accurate anthropometry in neonatal intensive care unit settings.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David A NyakoteyLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Angelica M ClarkeLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Barbara E CormackLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Frank H BloomfieldLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Jane E HardingLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand. j.harding@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0003-2697-1422
ProVIDe Study Group

Funding

CAUL and its Member Institutions
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFaltering postnatal growth in preterm babies is associated with adverse neurodevelopment. However, which growth reference is most helpful for predicting neurodevelopment is unknown. We examined associations between faltering growth and developmental delay in extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants.

methodsWe categorized faltering growth (z-score decrease ≥0.8 for weight/length, >1 for head circumference) between birth, 4 weeks, 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and 2 years' corrected age using fetal (Fenton, UK-WHO and Olsen) and healthy preterm (INTERGROWTH-21st) references. Associations between faltering growth and developmental delay were examined using binary logistic regression and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).

resultsIn 327 infants, Olsen charts identified the highest prevalence of faltering growth (weight 37%, length 63%, head 45%). Agreement in classification was higher amongst fetal references (kappa coefficient, ĸ = 0.46-0.94) than between INTERGROWTH-21st and fetal references (ĸ = 0.10-0.81). Faltering growth in all measures between 4-36 weeks (odds ratio, OR 2.0-4.7) compared with other time intervals (OR 1.7-2.7) were more strongly associated with developmental delay, particularly motor delay (OR 2.0-4.7). All growth references were poorly predictive of developmental delay at 2 years (AUC ≤ 0.62).

conclusionsFaltering postnatal growth in ELBW infants is associated with, but is poorly predictive of, developmental delay at 2 years. IMPACT: In babies born preterm, different growth references result in wide variation in categorization of faltering postnatal growth. Faltering growth in weight, length, and head circumference from 4 weeks to 36 weeks' postmenstrual age are associated with developmental delay at 2 years' corrected age, particularly motor delay. However, postnatal growth is a poor predictor of later developmental delay in extremely low birthweight infants irrespective of the growth reference used.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentInfant, Extremely Low Birth WeightBirth WeightChild, PreschoolDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleGestational AgeGrowth ChartsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLogistic ModelsMale

Identifiers

PMID38337041
PMCPMC11343699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.