Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38337035›Full record

ArticleNature immunology2024

Mucosal vaccine-induced cross-reactive CD8

Baoling Ying, Tamarand L Darling, Pritesh Desai, Chieh-Yu Liang, Igor P Dmitriev, Nadia Soudani, Traci Bricker, Elena A Kashentseva, Houda Harastani, Saravanan Raju and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. SARS-CoV-2-derived RNA replicons as safe and effective vaccines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry: implications for biomedical strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Baoling YingDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Tamarand L DarlingDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Pritesh DesaiDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4697-9475
Chieh-Yu LiangDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4624-7212
Igor P DmitrievDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9206-1975
Nadia SoudaniDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Traci BrickerDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Elena A KashentsevaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Houda HarastaniDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-6194
Saravanan RajuDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Meizi LiuDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Aaron G SchmidtRagon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3627-2553
David T CurielDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3802-6014
Adrianus C M BoonDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. jboon@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4700-8224
Michael S DiamondDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. mdiamond@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-3165
Washington University in St. Louis · USHarvard University · USSt. Andrews University · US

Funding

COLLABORATIVE INFLUENZA VACCINE INNOVATION CENTER: UNIVERSAL INFLUENZA VACCINE RESEARCH75N93019C00051 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KRAMMER, FLORIAN · 2019 to 2025
$105.4M
NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response: Universal Influenza Vaccine Research Activities75N93021C00016 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI WEBBY, RICHARD · 2021 to 2025
$91.4M
NIAID Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Response: Universal Influenza Vaccine Research Activities75N93021C00014 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI GARCIA-SASTRE, ADOLFO · 2021 to 2025
$62.6M
Human antibody-based countermeasures against the Wuhan Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2R01AI157155 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARIC, RALPH S, CROWE, JAMES E · 2020 to 2024
$6.0M
Epitope focusing to the receptor binding motif for a universal coronavirus vaccineR01AI146779 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SCHMIDT, AARON GREGORY · 2019 to 2023
$4.2M
Novel targeted adenovirusR01CA211096 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CURIEL, DAVID TERRY · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211096NIAID NIH HHS 75N93019C00051NIAID NIH HHS 75N93021C00014NIAID NIH HHS 75N93021C00016NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400008CNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI146779NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI157155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A nasally delivered chimpanzee adenoviral-vectored severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine (ChAd-SARS-CoV-2-S) is currently used in India (iNCOVACC). Here, we update this vaccine by creating ChAd-SARS-CoV-2-BA.5-S, which encodes a prefusion-stabilized BA.5 spike protein. Whereas serum neutralizing antibody responses induced by monovalent or bivalent adenoviral vaccines were poor against the antigenically distant XBB.1.5 strain and insufficient to protect in passive transfer experiments, mucosal antibody and cross-reactive memory T cell responses were robust, and protection was evident against WA1/2020 D614G and Omicron variants BQ.1.1 and XBB.1.5 in mice and hamsters. However, depletion of memory CD8

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Tract InfectionsVaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCricetinaeMicePan troglodytesSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID38337035
PMCPMC10907304
OpenAlexW4391680717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.