ArticleScientific reports2024
Allogeneic umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell implantation versus microdrilling combined with high tibial osteotomy for cartilage regeneration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- MOCART 2.0 score of 60 or greater measured at 1 year post-operatively predicts favourable clinical outcomes after surgical repair of tibiofemoral cartilage lesions.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
- Next-generation therapies for osteoarthritis: the evolving role of cell therapy products.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Challenges and Strategies in Hydrogel-Based Cartilage Regeneration.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Umbilical cord blood: a comprehensive review of protective and restorative properties in clinical applications - a narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Co-Culture Approaches in Cartilage and Bone Tissue Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Allogenic Bioengineered Cartilage Achieves Hyaline Cartilage Repair in a Large Animal Model: A Promising Step Forward.The American journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Bone Tissue Engineering: From Biomaterials to Clinical Trials.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- Combination Hyaluronic Acid and Multipotent Stromal Cells Fails to Improve Rat Knee OA Outcomes Compared to Cells Alone.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared cartilage regeneration outcomes in knee osteoarthritis (OA) using allogeneic human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell (hUCB-MSC) implantation and microdrilling with high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Fifty-four patients (60 knees) were included: 24 (27 knees) in the hUCB-MSC group and 30 (33 knees) in the microdrilling group. Both groups showed significant improvements in pain and functional scores at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline. At 24 months, the hUCB-MSC group had significantly improved scores. Arthroscopic assessment at 12 months revealed better cartilage healing in the hUCB-MSC group. In subgroup analysis according to the defect site, hUCB-MSC implantation showed superior cartilage healing for anterior lesions. In conclusion, both treatments demonstrated effectiveness for medial OA. However, hUCB-MSC implantation had better patient-reported outcomes and cartilage regeneration than microdrilling. The study suggests promising approaches for cartilage restoration in large knee defects due to OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.