Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38336974›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

VertXNet: an ensemble method for vertebral body segmentation and identification from cervical and lumbar spinal X-rays.

Yao Chen, Yuanhan Mo, Aimee Readie, Gregory Ligozio, Indrajeet Mandal, Faiz Jabbar, Thibaud Coroller, Bartłomiej W Papież

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Radiomics in spinal research: a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yao Chen *Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Yuanhan Mo *Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Aimee ReadieNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Gregory LigozioNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Indrajeet MandalJohn Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Faiz JabbarJohn Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Thibaud Coroller *Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Bartłomiej W Papież *Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. bartlomiej.papiez@bdi.ox.ac.uk.
Novartis (United States) · USUniversity of Oxford · GBOpen Data Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate annotation of vertebral bodies is crucial for automating the analysis of spinal X-ray images. However, manual annotation of these structures is a laborious and costly process due to their complex nature, including small sizes and varying shapes. To address this challenge and expedite the annotation process, we propose an ensemble pipeline called VertXNet. This pipeline currently combines two segmentation mechanisms, semantic segmentation using U-Net, and instance segmentation using Mask R-CNN, to automatically segment and label vertebral bodies in lateral cervical and lumbar spinal X-ray images. VertXNet enhances its effectiveness by adopting a rule-based strategy (termed the ensemble rule) for effectively combining segmentation outcomes from U-Net and Mask R-CNN. It determines vertebral body labels by recognizing specific reference vertebral instances, such as cervical vertebra 2 ('C2') in cervical spine X-rays and sacral vertebra 1 ('S1') in lumbar spine X-rays. Those references are commonly relatively easy to identify at the edge of the spine. To assess the performance of our proposed pipeline, we conducted evaluations on three spinal X-ray datasets, including two in-house datasets and one publicly available dataset. The ground truth annotations were provided by radiologists for comparison. Our experimental results have shown that the proposed pipeline outperformed two state-of-the-art (SOTA) segmentation models on our test dataset with a mean Dice of 0.90, vs. a mean Dice of 0.73 for Mask R-CNN and 0.72 for U-Net. We also demonstrated that VertXNet is a modular pipeline that enables using other SOTA model, like nnU-Net to further improve its performance. Furthermore, to evaluate the generalization ability of VertXNet on spinal X-rays, we directly tested the pre-trained pipeline on two additional datasets. A consistently strong performance was observed, with mean Dice coefficients of 0.89 and 0.88, respectively. In summary, VertXNet demonstrated significantly improved performance in vertebral body segmentation and labeling for spinal X-ray imaging. Its robustness and generalization were presented through the evaluation of both in-house clinical trial data and publicly available datasets.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedVertebral BodyCervical VertebraeImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiographyX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID38336974
PMCPMC10858234
OpenAlexW4391680688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.