ArticleInternational ophthalmology2024
Intrastromal corneal ring segments for keratoconus patients: up to 12 years follow up.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced Riboflavin Stromal Delivery Using Microchannel-Assisted Iontophoresis for Corneal Crosslinking.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation is a surgical technique developed with the purpose of avoiding the progression of corneal protrusion and is considered a viable option for managing patients with keratoconus as it stabilizes or improves vision thus delaying or excluding the need of more advanced surgical intervention such as penetrating keratoplasty. However, long term follow up is still limited to determine its actual success in achieving this goal. The current project aims to provide an extended follow up reporting a mean followup of around 5 years, extending up to 12.5 years.
methodsWe recruited patients who performed their ICRS between 2008 and 2013. We contacted patients for a follow up exam with a possible corneal tomography. For each patient, we obtained baseline pre operative data and latest follow up data which included visual acuity, subjective refraction, clinical slit-lamp exam, and corneal tomography. We compared the change in best corrected visual acuity and maximum keratometry readings from clinical visits before ring implantation to the latest follow up.
resultsA total of 68 eyes for 53 patients were included. The mean duration of follow up was 53.87 (± 38.8) months, with a maximum duration of 153 months. We found a significant improvement in corrected and uncorrected visual acuity, keratometries and refraction during the follow up period. On correlation analysis, strong negative significant correlation was found between duration since surgery and change in uncorrected visual acuity (p = 0.03, ρ = 0.338) and mean keratometry values (p = 0.033, ρ = 0.296). At the latest follow up for majority of patients with more than 100 weeks of follow up (12 eyes), uncorrected visual acuity were equal to or worse than baseline.
conclusionThis study represents the largest follow up for ICRS implanted in keratoconus patients. Improvement of visual acuity following ICRS implantation can be expected in the first few years, after which, a decline occurring thereafter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.