Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38336943›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Mobile app activity engagement by cancer patients and their caregivers informs remote monitoring.

Reem Yunis, Stephanie J Fonda, Sara Aghaee, Ai Kubo, Sharon W Davis, Raymond Liu, Elad Neeman, Ingrid Oakley-Girvan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Strategies to promote the dissemination of psychosocial digital health resources for those affected by cancer: scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Reem YunisStrategy and Science Departments, Medable Inc., 525 University Avenue, Suite A70, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, USA.
Stephanie J FondaEstenda Solutions, Inc., Wayne, PA, USA.
Sara AghaeeDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Ai KuboDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Sharon W DavisStrategy and Science Departments, Medable Inc., 525 University Avenue, Suite A70, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, USA.
Raymond LiuDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Elad NeemanSan Rafael Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Rafael, CA, USA.
Ingrid Oakley-GirvanStrategy and Science Departments, Medable Inc., 525 University Avenue, Suite A70, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, USA. Ingrid@medable.com.
Albemarle (United States) · USKaiser Permanente · USKaiser Permanente San Rafael Medical Center · US

Funding

NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201700030CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800010CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201800010I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile phone applications ("apps") are potentially an effective, low-burden method to collect patient-reported outcomes outside the clinical setting. Using such apps consistently and in a timely way is critical for complete and accurate data capture, but no studies of concurrent reporting by cancer patient-caregiver dyads have been published in the peer-reviewed literature. This study assessed app engagement, defined as adherence, timing, and attrition with two smartphone applications, one for adult cancer patients and one for their informal caregivers. This was a single-arm, pilot study in which adult cancer patients undergoing IV chemotherapy or immunotherapy used the DigiBioMarC app, and their caregivers used the TOGETHERCare app, for approximately one month to report weekly on the patients' symptoms and wellbeing. Using app timestamp metadata, we assessed user adherence, overall and by participant characteristics. Fifty patient-caregiver dyads completed the study. Within the one-month study period, both adult cancer patients and their informal caregivers were highly adherent, with app activity completion at 86% for cancer patients and 84% for caregivers. Caregivers completed 86% of symptom reports, while cancer patients completed 89% of symptom reports. Cancer patients and their caregivers completed most activities within 48 h of availability on the app. These results suggest that the DigiBioMarC and TOGETHERCare apps can be used to collect patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes data during intensive treatment. From our research, we conclude that metadata from mobile apps can be used to inform clinical teams about study participants' engagement and wellbeing outside the clinical setting.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneMobile ApplicationsNeoplasmsAdultCaregiversHumansPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID38336943
PMCPMC10858186
OpenAlexW4391678895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.