ArticleRadiological physics and technology2024
Verification of image quality improvement of low-count bone scintigraphy using deep learning.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Bone Metastasis Management: A Narrative Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- A deep-learning noise reduction algorithm outperforms the spatial filters previously required for bone SPECT on a high-speed whole-body 360° CZT-camera.EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- AI Revolution in Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine: Transforming and Innovating the Radiological Sciences.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Dose Reduction in Scintigraphic Imaging Through Enhanced Convolutional Autoencoder-Based Denoising.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based approach for acquisition time reduction in ventilation SPECT in patients after lung transplantation.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
- AI-Based Noise-Reduction Filter for Whole-Body Planar Bone Scintigraphy Reliably Improves Low-Count Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinical performance of deep learning-enhanced ultrafast whole-body scintigraphy in patients with suspected malignancy.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based correction for time truncation in cerebral computed tomography perfusion.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To improve image quality for low-count bone scintigraphy using deep learning and evaluate their clinical applicability. Six hundred patients (training, 500; validation, 50; evaluation, 50) were included in this study. Low-count original images (75%, 50%, 25%, 10%, and 5% counts) were generated from reference images (100% counts) using Poisson resampling. Output (DL-filtered) images were obtained after training with U-Net using reference images as teacher data. Gaussian-filtered images were generated for comparison. Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM) to the reference image were calculated to determine image quality. Artificial neural network (ANN) value, bone scan index (BSI), and number of hotspots (Hs) were computed using BONENAVI analysis to assess diagnostic performance. Accuracy of bone metastasis detection and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. PSNR and SSIM for DL-filtered images were highest in all count percentages. BONENAVI analysis values for DL-filtered images did not differ significantly, regardless of the presence or absence of bone metastases. BONENAVI analysis values for original and Gaussian-filtered images differed significantly at ≦25% counts in patients without bone metastases. In patients with bone metastases, BSI and Hs for original and Gaussian-filtered images differed significantly at ≦10% counts, whereas ANN values did not. The accuracy of bone metastasis detection was highest for DL-filtered images in all count percentages; the AUC did not differ significantly. The deep learning method improved image quality and bone metastasis detection accuracy for low-count bone scintigraphy, suggesting its clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38336939What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.