Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38336922›Full record

ReviewBehavior genetics2024

Statistical and Machine Learning Analysis in Brain-Imaging Genetics: A Review of Methods.

Connor L Cheek, Peggy Lindner, Elena L Grigorenko

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Behavior genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Connor L CheekTexas Institute for Evaluation, Measurement, and Statistics, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA. connor.cheek@times.uh.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6679-9172
Peggy LindnerTexas Institute for Evaluation, Measurement, and Statistics, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0447-5690
Elena L GrigorenkoTexas Institute for Evaluation, Measurement, and Statistics, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9646-4181

Funding

THE FLORIDA LONGITUDINAL STUDYP50HD052120 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TIFFANY P HOGAN, Nicole Sandi Patton-Terry · 2006 to 2026
$31.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD052120NIH HHS P50 HD052120, Project 6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-imaging-genetic analysis is an emerging field of research that aims at aggregating data from neuroimaging modalities, which characterize brain structure or function, and genetic data, which capture the structure and function of the genome, to explain or predict normal (or abnormal) brain performance. Brain-imaging-genetic studies offer great potential for understanding complex brain-related diseases/disorders of genetic etiology. Still, a combined brain-wide genome-wide analysis is difficult to perform as typical datasets fuse multiple modalities, each with high dimensionality, unique correlational landscapes, and often low statistical signal-to-noise ratios. In this review, we outline the progress in brain-imaging-genetic methodologies starting from early massive univariate to current deep learning approaches, highlighting each approach's strengths and weaknesses and elongating it with the field's development. We conclude by discussing selected remaining challenges and prospects for the field.

Indexed as

BrainMachine LearningNeuroimagingBrain-imaging genetic studiesBrain-imaging genomicsDeep learningMachine learningMethodologyStatistical analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.