Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38336899›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Analysis of US Food and Drug Administration new drug and biologic approvals, regulatory pathways, and review times, 1980-2022.

Enrique Seoane-Vazquez, Rosa Rodriguez-Monguio, John H Powers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recombinant Protein Drugs: A 2025 Update.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  6. Reimagining pharmacology education.Pharmacological reviews · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A generalizable deep learning framework for structure-based protein-ligand affinity ranking.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. The New Paradigm in Pharma R&D.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Developing, Analyzing, and Interpreting Outcome Assessments to Improve Endpoints in Infectious Diseases Clinical Research.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Enrique Seoane-VazquezDepartment of Pharmaceutical Economic and Policy, Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine, CA, USA. seoanevazquez@chapman.edu.
Rosa Rodriguez-MonguioDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
John H PowersDepartment of Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

Laura and John Arnold Foundation 20-05204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

U.S. laws enacted since 1983 have aimed to enhance the development and marketing of new pharmaceutical products. We thoroughly characterized all new molecular entities, therapeutic biologics, and gene and cell therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) during the period 1980-2022 in the context of these laws and regulations. Throughout the study period, the FDA approved 1355 new pharmaceutical products. The median FDA review time decreased from 26.6 months prior to the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (1992), which authorized the FDA to collect fees from drug companies to 9.9 months after the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (2012), which created new designations that eliminated the requirement for evidence of added therapeutic benefit for FDA expedited drug review. The greatest increase in approvals occurred in antineoplastic and immunomodulating drugs, biologics, and orphan drugs. More than half of new drug approvals benefited from regulatory designations and pathways that did not require addressing unmet medical needs or demonstrating therapeutic benefit over available alternatives. The legislative goal of bringing more drugs to the market faster has been achieved. Further studies are needed to determine the therapeutic value to patients of new drugs approved using expedited approval pathways.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsOrphan Drug ProductionBiological FactorsDrug ApprovalHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBiological FactorsBiological ProductsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID38336899
PMCPMC10858128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.