ArticleGut pathogens2024
Intestinal metabolites predict treatment resistance of patients with depression and anxiety.
Article in Gut pathogens, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacological modulation of the gut-brain axis: psychobiotics in focus for depression therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Human Gut Microbiota for Diagnosis and Treatment of Depression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Baseline gut microbiota profiles affect treatment response in patients with depression.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Impact of the gut microbiota-Th17 cell axis on inflammatory depression.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of the gut microbiota on neuropsychiatric disorders has gained much attention in recent years; however, comprehensive data on the relationship between the gut microbiome and its metabolites and resistance to treatment for depression and anxiety is lacking. Here, we investigated intestinal metabolites in patients with depression and anxiety disorders, and their possible roles in treatment resistance.
resultsWe analyzed fecal metabolites and microbiomes in 34 participants with depression and anxiety disorders. Fecal samples were obtained three times for each participant during the treatment. Propensity score matching led us to analyze data from nine treatment responders and nine non-responders, and the results were validated in the residual sample sets. Using elastic net regression analysis, we identified several metabolites, including N-ε-acetyllysine; baseline levels of the former were low in responders (AUC = 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-1). In addition, fecal levels of N-ε-acetyllysine were negatively associated with the abundance of Odoribacter. N-ε-acetyllysine levels increased as symptoms improved with treatment.
conclusionFecal N-ε-acetyllysine levels before treatment may be a predictive biomarker of treatment-refractory depression and anxiety. Odoribacter may play a role in the homeostasis of intestinal L-lysine levels. More attention should be paid to the importance of L-lysine metabolism in those with depression and anxiety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.