Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38336672›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

A 10-step participatory program for developing, implementing, and evaluating physical activity promoting actions in nursing homes in Germany.

Lea-Sofie Hahn, Ansgar Thiel, Viola Dembeck, Daniel Haigis, Leon Matting, Rebekka Pomiersky, Gerhard W Eschweiler, Andreas M Nieß, Gorden Sudeck, Annika Frahsa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lea-Sofie HahnInstitute of Sports Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ansgar ThielInstitute of Sports Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Viola DembeckInstitute of Sports Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Daniel HaigisDepartment of Sports Medicine, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Leon MattingInstitute of Sports Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Rebekka PomierskyInstitute of Sports Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Gerhard W EschweilerGeriatric Centre, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas M NießDepartment of Sports Medicine, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Gorden SudeckInstitute of Sports Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Annika FrahsaInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. annika.frahsa@unibe.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince multidimensional barriers challenge nursing homes, a socio-ecological approach is needed for physical activity promotion in this setting. So far, little is known about how such an approach can be transferred into the successful development and implementation of PA-promoting actions together with stakeholders on-site. We aimed to investigate the actions and dimensions of PA-promoting actions and their sustainable implementation. To contribute to closing this gap, we present a 10-step program for co-developing and co-evaluating PA-promoting actions in nursing homes through an integrated counselling approach.

methodsWe used a multiple case study approach that built upon manifold data sources, collected in 7 nursing homes over 3 years between 2021 and 2023. We collected fieldnotes and photologs from 14 future workshops (2 per home); 7 evaluation workshops (1 per home); 36 individual counsellings (2 sessions per resident), as well as 87 implementation protocols (action type and frequency), 11 evaluation questionnaires (changes among resources, cooperations, and collaborations); 7 goal attainment scales and 18 individual activity schedules. In addition, we retrieved and documented progress information at regular intervals by phone or email.

resultsWith staff, residents, relatives, and volunteers, we co-developed 112 ideas for PA promotion; from which 54 ideas were implemented and integrated into everyday life, differentiated into "activities of daily living," "structured activities," and "activity-friendly environments."; 18 residents in 4 homes participated in individual counselling to develop individual activity schedules. Eighteen actions were rated as "(much) more successful than expected"; 10 "(much) worse than expected," and 23 "as successful as expected." Three actions were not evaluated. DISCUSSION: The participatory integrated counselling approach led to home-specific actions and promoted implementation into everyday life. The number and dimensions of actions implemented largely depended on the mission and vision of the respective home. The lack of staff could partially be compensated for by involving neighbourhoods, volunteers, and community organisations, such as local clubs.

conclusionTo effectively promote PA in nursing homes, a tailored approach considering structural conditions, locations, volunteer engagement, and organisational visions is essential. Long-lasting partnerships and low-threshold opportunities prove promising. Future research should delve into structural-level change processes and outcomes in this context.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingNursing HomesExerciseGermanyHumansInterpersonal RelationsNursing homesParticipatory Integrated Counselling ApproachPhysical Activity Promotion

Identifiers

PMID38336672
PMCPMC10854033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.