Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38336364›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024

Systematic Evaluation of Chromatographic Peak Quality for Targeted Mass Spectrometry via Variational Autoencoder.

Chi Yang, Yung-Chin Hsiao, Chi-Ching Lee, Jau-Song Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chi YangMolecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1676-5185
Yung-Chin HsiaoMolecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0046-3016
Chi-Ching LeeDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-2912-7745
Jau-Song YuMolecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted mass spectrometry is a powerful technique for quantifying specific proteins or metabolites in complex biological samples. Accurate peak picking is a critical step as it determines the absolute abundance of each analyte by integrating the area under the picked peaks. Although automated software exists for handling such complex tasks, manual intervention is often required to rectify potential errors like misclassification or mis-picking events, which can significantly affect quantification accuracy. Therefore, it is necessary to develop objective scoring functions to evaluate peak-picking results and to identify problematic cases for further inspection. In this study, we present targeted mass spectrometry quality encoder (TMSQE), a data-driven scoring function that summarizes peak quality in three types: transition level, peak group level, and consistency level across samples. Through unsupervised learning from large data sets containing 1,703,827 peak groups, TMSQE establishes a reliable standard for systematic and objective evaluations of chromatographic peak quality in targeted mass spectrometry. TMSQE shows a high degree of consistency with expert experiences and can efficiently capture problematic cases after the automated software. Furthermore, we demonstrate the generalizability of TMSQE by successfully applying it to various data sets, including both peptide and metabolite data sets. Our proposed scoring approach provides a reliable solution for consistent and accurate peak quality evaluation, facilitating peak quality control for targeted mass spectrometry.

Identifiers

PMID38336364
PMCPMC10882576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.