ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024
Systematic Evaluation of Chromatographic Peak Quality for Targeted Mass Spectrometry via Variational Autoencoder.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MsTargetPeaker: A Quality-Aware Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Peak Identification in Targeted Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted mass spectrometry is a powerful technique for quantifying specific proteins or metabolites in complex biological samples. Accurate peak picking is a critical step as it determines the absolute abundance of each analyte by integrating the area under the picked peaks. Although automated software exists for handling such complex tasks, manual intervention is often required to rectify potential errors like misclassification or mis-picking events, which can significantly affect quantification accuracy. Therefore, it is necessary to develop objective scoring functions to evaluate peak-picking results and to identify problematic cases for further inspection. In this study, we present targeted mass spectrometry quality encoder (TMSQE), a data-driven scoring function that summarizes peak quality in three types: transition level, peak group level, and consistency level across samples. Through unsupervised learning from large data sets containing 1,703,827 peak groups, TMSQE establishes a reliable standard for systematic and objective evaluations of chromatographic peak quality in targeted mass spectrometry. TMSQE shows a high degree of consistency with expert experiences and can efficiently capture problematic cases after the automated software. Furthermore, we demonstrate the generalizability of TMSQE by successfully applying it to various data sets, including both peptide and metabolite data sets. Our proposed scoring approach provides a reliable solution for consistent and accurate peak quality evaluation, facilitating peak quality control for targeted mass spectrometry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.