Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38335992›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2024

["…Not Even in The Corridor!" - Subjective Perception Of Institutional Measures During The Covid-19 Pandemic Of Nursing Home Residents: A Qualitative Study].

Linda Sanftenberg, Anja Hoerger, Katharina Mayr, Armin Nassehi, Domenika Wildgruber, Anita Hausen, Christian Janke, Michael Hoelscher, Dagmar Hindenburg, Christine Eidenschink and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Linda SanftenbergInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany.
Anja HoergerInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany.
Katharina MayrInstitut für Soziologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
Armin NassehiInstitut für Soziologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
Domenika WildgruberKatholische Stiftungshochschule München, University of Applied Sciences, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6874-1428
Anita HausenKatholische Stiftungshochschule München, University of Applied Sciences, München, Germany.
Christian JankeAbteilung für Infektions- und Tropenmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany.
Michael HoelscherAbteilung für Infektions- und Tropenmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany.
Dagmar HindenburgInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Christine EidenschinkInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Laura RinkAllgemeinmedizinisches Institut, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Maria SebastiãoAllgemeinmedizinisches Institut, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0838-7989
Daniel TeupserInstitut für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany.
Helena KosubInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany.
Isabel ZoellingerInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany.
Tobias DreischulteInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany.
Jochen GensichenInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, München, Germany.
für die BACOM-Studiengruppe
LMU Klinikum · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEKatholische Stiftungshochschule München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, institutional measures were decreed to protect nursing home residents from infection. Their appropriateness has been a subject of controversy. The aim of this work was to better understand the subjective perception of the protective measures during the Covid-19 pandemic by the nursing home residents in Bavaria and to shed light on the role of nursing staff and general practitioners in coping with the crisis.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with residents of inpatient long-term care facilities. Data analysis was carried out by means of structured content analysis according to Kuckartz.

resultsA total of ten nursing home residents with various degrees of care were interviewed, five of whom had already been infected with Covid-19 at the time of the survey. The respondents reported, on the one hand, their need for protection and, on the other hand, the isolation they experienced during the pandemic. Trust in the care provided by the nursing staff was emphasized. A reliable personal contact to already known general practitioners was missing.

conclusionThe role of nurses and general practitioners deserves more attention and may be a key to better acceptance and management of such crisis situations.

Indexed as

COVID-19GermanyHumansNursing HomesPandemicsPerception

Identifiers

PMID38335992
PMCPMC10974666
OpenAlexW4391676035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.