Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38335970›Full record

ArticleACS nano2024

Polarization Dynamics of Solid-State Quantum Emitters.

Anand Kumar, Çağlar Samaner, Chanaprom Cholsuk, Tjorben Matthes, Serkan Paçal, Yağız Oyun, Ashkan Zand, Robert J Chapman, Grégoire Saerens, Rachel Grange and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS nano, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Insights Into the Nature of Quantum Emitters in Electron-Irradiated Hexagonal Boron Nitride.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anand KumarDepartment of Computer Engineering, School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9868-6220
Çağlar SamanerDepartment of Physics, İzmir Institute of Technology, 35430 İzmir, Turkey.
Chanaprom CholsukDepartment of Computer Engineering, School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5936-8032
Tjorben MatthesDepartment of Computer Engineering, School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Serkan PaçalDepartment of Physics, İzmir Institute of Technology, 35430 İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1757-5228
Yağız OyunDepartment of Photonics, İzmir Institute of Technology, 35430 İzmir, Turkey.
Ashkan ZandDepartment of Computer Engineering, School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Robert J ChapmanOptical Nanomaterial Group, Institute for Quantum Electronics, Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0368-8483
Grégoire SaerensOptical Nanomaterial Group, Institute for Quantum Electronics, Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8568-8462
Rachel GrangeOptical Nanomaterial Group, Institute for Quantum Electronics, Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7469-9756
Sujin SuwannaOptical and Quantum Physics Laboratory, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, 10400 Bangkok, Thailand.
Serkan AteşDepartment of Physics, İzmir Institute of Technology, 35430 İzmir, Turkey.
Tobias VoglDepartment of Computer Engineering, School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0993-0648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantum emitters in solid-state crystals have recently attracted a great deal of attention due to their simple applicability in optical quantum technologies. The polarization of single photons generated by quantum emitters is one of the key parameters that plays a crucial role in various applications, such as quantum computation, which uses the indistinguishability of photons. However, the degree of single-photon polarization is typically quantified using the time-averaged photoluminescence intensity of single emitters, which provides limited information about the dipole properties in solids. In this work, we use single defects in hexagonal boron nitride and nanodiamond as efficient room-temperature single-photon sources to reveal the origin and temporal evolution of the dipole orientation in solid-state quantum emitters. The angles of the excitation and emission dipoles relative to the crystal axes were determined experimentally and then calculated using density functional theory, which resulted in characteristic angles for every specific defect that can be used as an efficient tool for defect identification and understanding their atomic structure. Moreover, the temporal polarization dynamics revealed a strongly modified linear polarization visibility that depends on the excited-state decay time of the individual excitation. This effect can potentially be traced back to the excitation of excess charges in the local crystal environment. Understanding such hidden time-dependent mechanisms can further improve the performance of polarization-sensitive experiments, particularly that for quantum communication with single-photon emitters.

Indexed as

defect identificationdensity functional theoryelectron irradiationhexagonal boron nitridenanodiamond NV centersquantum emitters arraytemporal polarization dynamics

Identifiers

PMID38335970
PMCPMC10883057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.