Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38335664›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2024

Effect of crossbreeding on egg quality, incubation, and hatching activities of the pure and reciprocal cross between the Sasso and Wassache chickens.

Joshua T Dzungwe, Koffi Tozo, Christophe A A M Chrysostome, Rachida A Tankouano, Oyegunle E Oke, Kokou Tona

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Joshua T DzungweCentre d'Excellence Régionale sur les Science Aviares (CERSA), Université de Lomé, Lomé, Togo; Department of Animal Breeding and Physiology, Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Nigeria. Electronic address: torsagain@gmail.com.
Koffi TozoCentre d'Excellence Régionale sur les Science Aviares (CERSA), Université de Lomé, Lomé, Togo.
Christophe A A M ChrysostomeDepartment of Animal Production, University of Abomey-Cavali, Abomey-Cavali, Benin.
Rachida A TankouanoCentre d'Excellence Régionale sur les Science Aviares (CERSA), Université de Lomé, Lomé, Togo.
Oyegunle E OkeCentre d'Excellence Régionale sur les Science Aviares (CERSA), Université de Lomé, Lomé, Togo; Department of Animal Physiology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
Kokou TonaCentre d'Excellence Régionale sur les Science Aviares (CERSA), Université de Lomé, Lomé, Togo.
University of Lomé · TGFederal University of Agriculture · NGUniversité d'Abomey-Calavi · BJ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the effect of crossbreeding on egg quality and incubation is essential for the selection of superior genetic combinations in breeding programs. This study evaluated the effect of crossbreeding on egg quality and incubation activities of the Sasso and Wassache chickens in a pure (Sasso X Sasso [SS]; Wassache X Wassache [WW]) and reciprocal cross (Wassache X Sasso [WS]; Sasso X Wassache [SW]) design. A total of 1431 eggs were incubated while 400 eggs were selected for egg quality. Fertility, hatchability, and hatching activities were expressed in percentage, while egg quality traits were determined. The crosses with Sasso hens laid similar (P > 0.05) but heavier (P < 0.05) eggs with higher (P < 0.05) egg components compared to the crosses with Wassache hens. The SS, SW, and WW genotypes recorded similar (P > 0.05) early embryonic mortality (EEM) and were lower (P < 0.05) compared to the WS genotype. Late embryonic mortality (LEM) between the reciprocal crosses and SS was similar (P > 0.05) and lower (P < 0.05) compared to the WW. The hatchability and hatchability of fertile eggs between the purebreds and the SW cross were comparable (P > 0.05), while those of the WS genotype was lower compared to the SS cross. Hatch duration in the crossbreds was shorter (P < 0.05) compared to the pure Sasso. Mortality between the SW and WW was similar (P > 0.05) while the WS cross recorded a higher (P < 0.05) mortality compared to the purebreds. Crossbreeding improved egg quality, reduced LEM, and accelerated crossbred hatching events. The SW cross is recommended for better performance.

Indexed as

ChickensOvumAnimalsFemaleFertilityGenotypeHybridization, Geneticchick-qualitycrossbreedingegg qualityhatching-eventincubation

Identifiers

PMID38335664
PMCPMC10869303
OpenAlexW4390746438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.