Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38335258›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Modeling and dissociation of intrinsic and input-driven neural population dynamics underlying behavior.

Parsa Vahidi, Omid G Sani, Maryam M Shanechi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. BRAID: Input-driven nonlinear dynamical modeling of neural-behavioral data.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Spectral Learning of Shared Dynamics Between Generalized-Linear Processes.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Parsa Vahidi *Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-8382
Omid G Sani *Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.ORCID 0000-0003-3032-5669
Maryam M ShanechiMing Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.ORCID 0000-0002-0544-7720

Funding

Model-based neural control of brain stimulation for neuropsychiatric disordersR01MH123770 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SHANECHI, MARYAM · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
A novel geometric paradigm for nonlinear modeling and control of neural dynamicsDP2MH126378 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SHANECHI, MARYAM · 2020 to 2020
$2.5M
NIMH NIH HHS DP2 MH126378NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural dynamics can reflect intrinsic dynamics or dynamic inputs, such as sensory inputs or inputs from other brain regions. To avoid misinterpreting temporally structured inputs as intrinsic dynamics, dynamical models of neural activity should account for measured inputs. However, incorporating measured inputs remains elusive in joint dynamical modeling of neural-behavioral data, which is important for studying neural computations of behavior. We first show how training dynamical models of neural activity while considering behavior but not input or input but not behavior may lead to misinterpretations. We then develop an analytical learning method for linear dynamical models that simultaneously accounts for neural activity, behavior, and measured inputs. The method provides the capability to prioritize the learning of intrinsic behaviorally relevant neural dynamics and dissociate them from both other intrinsic dynamics and measured input dynamics. In data from a simulated brain with fixed intrinsic dynamics that performs different tasks, the method correctly finds the same intrinsic dynamics regardless of the task while other methods can be influenced by the task. In neural datasets from three subjects performing two different motor tasks with task instruction sensory inputs, the method reveals low-dimensional intrinsic neural dynamics that are missed by other methods and are more predictive of behavior and/or neural activity. The method also uniquely finds that the intrinsic behaviorally relevant neural dynamics are largely similar across the different subjects and tasks, whereas the overall neural dynamics are not. These input-driven dynamical models of neural-behavioral data can uncover intrinsic dynamics that may otherwise be missed.

Indexed as

BrainNeuronsHumansLearningModels, Neurologicalbehaviordynamical systemsinput dynamicsintrinsic dynamicsneural encoding

Identifiers

PMID38335258
PMCPMC10873612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.