Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38335242›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2024

Estimating the health impact of nicotine exposure by dissecting the effects of nicotine versus non-nicotine constituents of tobacco smoke: A multivariable Mendelian randomisation study.

Jasmine N Khouja, Eleanor Sanderson, Robyn E Wootton, Amy E Taylor, Billy A Church, Rebecca C Richmond, Marcus R Munafò

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Managing the Exponential Growth of Mendelian Randomization Studies.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jasmine N KhoujaSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7944-2981
Eleanor SandersonMedical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5188-5775
Robyn E WoottonSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3961-3202
Amy E TaylorMedical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Billy A ChurchSchool of Psychology and Vision Sciences, University of Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5548-1508
Rebecca C RichmondMedical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Marcus R MunafòSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 29019Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UU_00032/01Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UU_00032/04Medical Research Council (MRC) MC_UU_00032/07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detrimental health effects of smoking are well-known, but the impact of regular nicotine use without exposure to the other constituents of tobacco is less clear. Given the increasing daily use of alternative nicotine delivery systems, such as e-cigarettes, it is increasingly important to understand and separate the effects of nicotine use from the impact of tobacco smoke exposure. Using a multivariable Mendelian randomisation framework, we explored the direct effects of nicotine compared with the non-nicotine constituents of tobacco smoke on health outcomes (lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV-1], forced vital capacity [FVC], coronary heart disease [CHD], and heart rate [HR]). We used Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) summary statistics from Buchwald and colleagues, the GWAS and Sequencing Consortium of Alcohol and Nicotine, the International Lung Cancer Consortium, and UK Biobank. Increased nicotine metabolism increased the risk of COPD, lung cancer, and lung function in the univariable analysis. However, when accounting for smoking heaviness in the multivariable analysis, we found that increased nicotine metabolite ratio (indicative of decreased nicotine exposure per cigarette smoked) decreases heart rate (b = -0.30, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.10) and lung function (b = -33.33, 95% CI -41.76 to -24.90). There was no clear evidence of an effect on the remaining outcomes. The results suggest that these smoking-related outcomes are not due to nicotine exposure but are caused by the other components of tobacco smoke; however, there are multiple potential sources of bias, and the results should be triangulated using evidence from a range of methodologies.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsLung NeoplasmsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveTobacco Smoke PollutionGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisNicotineSmokingTobacco ProductsNicotineTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID38335242
PMCPMC10883537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.