Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38335201›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Intra and inter-rater reproducibility of the Remote Static Posture Assessment (ARPE) protocol's Postural Checklist.

Betiane Moreira Pilling, Cláudia Tarragô Candotti, Marcelle Guimarães Silva, Marina Ziegler Frantz, Matias Noll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Betiane Moreira PillingPrograma de Pós-Graduação de Ciências do Movimento Humano, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6920-6283
Cláudia Tarragô CandottiPrograma de Pós-Graduação de Ciências do Movimento Humano, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8676-9157
Marcelle Guimarães SilvaPrograma de Pós-Graduação de Ciências do Movimento Humano, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6472-5199
Marina Ziegler FrantzPrograma de Pós-Graduação de Ciências do Movimento Humano, UFRGS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Matias NollChild and Adolescent Health Research Group (GPSaCA), Instituto Federal Goiano, Goiás, Brazil3 Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiás, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the enforcement of social distancing due to the pandemic, a need to conduct postural assessments through remote care arose. So, this study aimed to assess the intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of the Remote Static Posture Assessment (ARPE) protocol's Postural Checklist. The study involved 51 participants, with the postural assessment conducted by two researchers. For intra-rater reproducibility assessment, one rater administered the ARPE protocol twice, with an interval of 7-days between assessments (test-retest). A second independent rater assessed inter-rater reproducibility. Kappa statistics (k) and percentage agreement (%C) were used, with a significance level of 0.05. The intra-rater reproducibility analysis indicated high reliability, k values varied from 0.921 to 1.0, with %C ranging from 94% to 100% for all items on the ARPE protocol's Postural Checklist. Inter-rater reproducibility indicates reliability ranging from slight to good, k values exceeded 0.4 for the entire checklist, except for four items: waists in the frontal photograph (k = 0.353), scapulae in the rear photograph (k = 0.310), popliteal line of the knees in the rear photograph (k = 0.270), and foot posture in the rear photograph (k = 0.271). Nonetheless, %C surpassed 50% for all but the scapulae item (%C = 47%). The ARPE protocol's Postural Checklist is reproducible and can be administered by the same or different raters for static posture assessment. However, when used by distinct raters, the items waists (front of the frontal plane), scapulae, popliteal line of the knees, and feet (rear of the frontal plane) should not be considered.

Indexed as

ChecklistPostureHumansObserver VariationReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID38335201
PMCPMC10857740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.