Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38335193›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

MOOC-based blended learning for knowledge translation capacity-building: A qualitative evaluative study.

Christian Dagenais, Aurélie Hot, Anne Bekelynck, Romane Villemin, Esther Mc Sween-Cadieux, Valéry Ridde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christian DagenaisDepartment of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Aurélie HotDepartment of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Anne BekelynckProgramme PAC-CI, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Romane VilleminDepartment of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7359-9614
Esther Mc Sween-CadieuxDepartment of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Valéry RiddeUniversité Paris Cité, IRD, Inserm, Ceped, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9299-8266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This qualitative study investigated the effectiveness of blended learning using MOOCs (massive open online courses) for capacity-building in knowledge translation (KT). The evaluation followed Kirkpatrick's updated model. A total of 23 semi-directed interviews were conducted with participants working at a research centre in Côte d'Ivoire, with a first wave of interviews immediately post-training and a second wave after five months. Results showed that the training met learners' needs, with both the content and teaching format being deemed appropriate. Learners reacted positively to face-to-face activities and affirmed the importance of coaching for putting learning into practice. Specific KT skills and principles appeared to have been acquired, such as a procedure for structuring the KT process and improved skills for communicating and presenting scientific knowledge. Five months after the training, encouraging changes were reported, but the sustainability of the new KT practices remained uncertain. KT capacity-building initiatives in low- and middle-income countries struggle to meet demand. Little is known about effective KT training in that context, and even less in non-anglophone countries. The study presented here contributes to the understanding of success factors from the learners' standpoint.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceTranslational Science, BiomedicalCapacity BuildingHumansLearningQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID38335193
PMCPMC10857586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.