Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38335165›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Understanding COVID-19 vaccination behaviors and intentions in Ghana: A Behavioral Insights (BI) study.

Swathi Vepachedu, Anastasiia Nurzenska, Anna-Leena Lohiniva, Al-Hassan Hudi, Sena Deku, Julianne Birungi, Karen Greiner, Joseph Sherlock, Chelsi Campbell, Lori Foster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Swathi VepacheduCenter for Advanced Hindsight, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Anastasiia NurzenskaUNICEF Ghana Country Office, Accra, Ghana.
Anna-Leena LohinivaUNICEF Ghana Country Office, Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-3169-5872
Al-Hassan HudiUNICEF Ghana Country Office, Accra, Ghana.
Sena DekuVIAMO, Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-3742-7860
Julianne BirungiUNICEF Regional Office Central and West Africa, Dakar, Senegal.
Karen GreinerUNICEF Regional Office Central and West Africa, Dakar, Senegal.
Joseph SherlockCenter for Advanced Hindsight, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Chelsi CampbellCenter for Advanced Hindsight, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Lori FosterDepartment of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
North Carolina State University · USWest and Central African Council for Agricultural Research and Development · SNDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVaccine uptake is influenced by a variety of factors. Behavioral Insights (BI) can be used to address vaccine hesitancy to understand the factors that influence the decision to take or refuse a vaccine. METHODOLOGY: This two-part study consisted of a survey designed to identify the influence of various drivers of people's COVID-19 vaccination status and their intention to take the vaccine in Ghana, as well as an experiment to test which of several behaviorally informed message frames had the greatest effect on vaccine acceptance. Data was collected from a total of 1494 participants; 1089 respondents (73%) reported already being vaccinated and 405 respondents (27%) reported not being vaccinated yet. The mobile phone-based surveys were conducted between December 2021 and January 2022 using Random Digit Dialing (RDD) to recruit study participants. Data analysis included regression models, relative weights analyses, and ANOVAs.

resultsThe findings indicated that vaccine uptake in Ghana is influenced more by social factors (what others think) than by practical factors such as ease of vaccination. Respondents' perceptions of their family's and religious leaders' attitudes towards the vaccine were among the most influential drivers. Unexpectedly, healthcare providers' positive attitudes about the COVID-19 vaccine had a significant negative relationship with respondents' vaccination behavior. Vaccine intention was positively predicted by risk perception, ease of vaccination, and the degree to which respondents considered the vaccine effective. Perceptions of religious leaders' attitudes also significantly and positively predicted respondents' intention to get vaccinated. Although perceptions of religious leaders' views about the vaccine are an important driver of vaccine acceptance, results asking respondents to rank-order who influences them suggest that people may not be consciously aware-or do not want to admit-the degree to which they are affected by what religious leaders think. Message frames that included fear, altruism, social norms were all followed by positive responses toward the vaccine, as were messages with three distinct messengers: Ghana Health Services, a doctor, and religious leaders.

conclusionsWhat drives COVID-19 vaccine intentions does not necessarily drive behaviors. The results of this study can be used to develop appropriate COVID-19 vaccine uptake strategies targeting the most important drivers of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, using effective message frames.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesGhanaHumansIntentionVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID38335165
PMCPMC10857727
OpenAlexW4391677698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.