Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38335001›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Effect of Tai Chi vs Aerobic Exercise on Blood Pressure in Patients With Prehypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Xinye Li, Peifen Chang, Min Wu, Yuchen Jiang, Yonghong Gao, Hengwen Chen, Liyuan Tao, Dawei Wei, Xiaochen Yang, Xingjiang Xiong and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
26.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Xinye LiGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Peifen ChangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Min WuGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Yuchen JiangGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Yonghong GaoKey Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of the Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing.
Hengwen ChenGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Liyuan TaoClinical Epidemiology Research Center of the Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing, China.
Dawei WeiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiaochen YangGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Xingjiang XiongGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Yan YangVasculocardiology Department, Fuzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, China.
Xiandu PanGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Ran ZhaoYongDingLu Community Health Care Center, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fan YangGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Jiahao SunTraditional Chinese Medicine Department, BaiLi Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinic, Beijing.
Shengjie YangGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Li TianMedical Department of Beijing Gulou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaofang HeCardiovascular Department of Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Taiyuan, China.
Eryu WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yiyuan YangGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Yanwei XingGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing.
Guang’anmen Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNDongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNAerospace Center Hospital · CNBeijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CNShanxi University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prehypertension increases the risk of developing hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. Early and effective intervention for patients with prehypertension is highly important. Objective: To assess the efficacy of Tai Chi vs aerobic exercise in patients with prehypertension. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, single-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted between July 25, 2019, and January 24, 2022, at 2 tertiary public hospitals in China. Participants included 342 adults aged 18 to 65 years with prehypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 120 to 139 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) of 80 to 89 mm Hg. Interventions: Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a Tai Chi group (n = 173) or an aerobic exercise group (n = 169). Both groups performed four 60-minute supervised sessions per week for 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was SBP at 12 months obtained in the office setting. Secondary outcomes included SBP at 6 months and DBP at 6 and 12 months obtained in the office setting and 24-hour ambulatory BP at 12 months. Results: Of the 1189 patients screened, 342 (mean [SD] age, 49.3 [11.9] years; 166 men [48.5%] and 176 women [51.5%]) were randomized to 1 of 2 intervention groups: 173 to Tai Chi and 169 to aerobic exercise. At 12 months, the change in office SBP was significantly different between groups by -2.40 (95% CI, -4.39 to -0.41) mm Hg (P = .02), with a mean (SD) change of -7.01 (10.12) mm Hg in the Tai Chi group vs -4.61 (8.47) mm Hg in the aerobic exercise group. The analysis of office SBP at 6 months yielded similar results (-2.31 [95% CI, -3.94 to -0.67] mm Hg; P = .006). Additionally, 24-hour ambulatory SBP (-2.16 [95% CI, -3.84 to -0.47] mm Hg; P = .01) and nighttime ambulatory SBP (-4.08 [95% CI, -6.59 to -1.57] mm Hg; P = .002) were significantly reduced in the Tai Chi group compared with the aerobic exercise group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study including patients with prehypertension, a 12-month Tai Chi intervention was more effective than aerobic exercise in reducing SBP. These findings suggest that Tai Chi may help promote the prevention of cardiovascular disease in populations with prehypertension. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1900024368.

Indexed as

PrehypertensionTai JiAdolescentAdultAgedBlood PressureExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38335001
PMCPMC10858403
OpenAlexW4391692802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.