Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38335000›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Efficacy and Safety of 5-Day Oral Ensitrelvir for Patients With Mild to Moderate COVID-19: The SCORPIO-SR Randomized Clinical Trial.

Hiroshi Yotsuyanagi, Norio Ohmagari, Yohei Doi, Masaya Yamato, Nguyen Hoang Bac, Bong Ki Cha, Takumi Imamura, Takuhiro Sonoyama, Genki Ichihashi, Takao Sanaki and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 67 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
38.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Ensitrelvir for the Treatment of Nonhospitalized Adults with COVID-19: Results from the SCORPIO-HR, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Hiroshi YotsuyanagiThe Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Norio OhmagariDisease Control and Prevention Center, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yohei DoiDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Masaya YamatoInfectious Diseases Center, Rinku General Medical Center, Izumisano, Japan.
Nguyen Hoang BacEndoscopic Surgery Training Center, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Bong Ki ChaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang Medical Health Care System Hyundae Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Takumi ImamuraDrug Development and Regulatory Science Division, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Takuhiro SonoyamaDrug Development and Regulatory Science Division, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Genki IchihashiDrug Development and Regulatory Science Division, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Takao SanakiResearch Division, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Toyonaka, Japan.
Yuko TsugeDrug Development and Regulatory Science Division, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Takeki UeharaDrug Development and Regulatory Science Division, Shionogi & Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi MukaeDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Shionogi (Japan) · JPChung-Ang University Hospital · KRFujita Health University · JPFutaba (Japan) · JPNagasaki University · JPNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Treatment options for COVID-19 are warranted irrespective of the presence of risk factors for severe disease. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of ensitrelvir in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3 part of a phase 2/3, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted from February 10 to July 10, 2022, with a 28-day follow-up period, at 92 institutions in Japan, Vietnam, and South Korea. Patients (aged 12 to <70 years) with mild to moderate COVID-19 within 120 hours of positive viral test results were studied. Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive 125 mg of once-daily ensitrelvir (375 mg on day 1), 250 mg of once-daily ensitrelvir (750 mg on day 1), or placebo for 5 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the time to resolution of the composite of 5 characteristic symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection, assessed using a Peto-Prentice generalized Wilcoxon test stratified by vaccination history. Virologic efficacy and safety were also assessed. Results: A total of 1821 patients were randomized, of whom 1030 (347 in the 125-mg ensitrelvir group, 340 in the 250-mg ensitrelvir group, and 343 in the placebo group) were randomized in less than 72 hours of disease onset (primary analysis population). The mean (SD) age in this population was 35.2 (12.3) years, and 552 (53.6%) were men. A significant difference was observed between the 125-mg ensitrelvir group and the placebo group (P = .04 with a Peto-Prentice generalized Wilcoxon test). The difference in median time was approximately 1 day between the 125-mg ensitrelvir group and the placebo group (167.9 vs 192.2 hours; difference, -24.3 hours; 95% CI, -78.7 to 11.7 hours). Adverse events were observed in 267 of 604 patients (44.2%) in the 125-mg ensitrelvir group, 321 of 599 patients (53.6%) in the 250-mg ensitrelvir group, and 150 of 605 patients (24.8%) in the placebo group, which included a decrease in high-density lipoprotein level (188 [31.1%] in the 125-mg ensitrelvir group, 231 [38.6%] in the 250-mg ensitrelvir group, and 23 [3.8%] in the placebo group). No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, 125-mg ensitrelvir treatment reduced the time to resolution of the 5 typical COVID-19 symptoms compared with placebo in patients treated in less than 72 hours of disease onset; the absolute difference in median time to resolution was approximately 1 day. Ensitrelvir demonstrated clinical and antiviral efficacy without new safety concerns. Generalizability to populations outside Asia should be confirmed. Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT2031210350.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drugs, Chinese HerbalIndazolesTriazinesTriazolesAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2Young AdultDrugs, Chinese HerbalensitrelvirIndazolesscorpioTriazinesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID38335000
PMCPMC10858401
OpenAlexW4391692592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.