Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38334885›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2024

A Systematic Review on the Genetic Contribution to Tinnitus.

Patricia Perez-Carpena, Jose A Lopez-Escamez, Álvaro Gallego-Martinez

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Tinnitus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Patricia Perez-CarpenaOtology and Neurotology Group CTS495, Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, Ibs.GRANADA, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain. percarpena@ugr.es.
Jose A Lopez-EscamezOtology and Neurotology Group CTS495, Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, Ibs.GRANADA, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain. jose.lopezescamez@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8583-1430
Álvaro Gallego-MartinezOtology and Neurotology Group CTS495, Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria, Ibs.GRANADA, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Andalusian Health Government Grant DOC_01677Andalusian Health Government Grant RH-0150-2020Horizon 2020 Framework Programme Grant Agreement No 848261'la Caixa' Foundation GNP-182 GENDER-Net Co-PlusUniversity of Sydney K7013_B3413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the available evidence to support a genetic contribution and define the role of common and rare variants in tinnitus.

methodsAfter a systematic search and quality assessment, 31 records including 383,063 patients were selected (14 epidemiological studies and 17 genetic association studies). General information on the sample size, age, sex, tinnitus prevalence, severe tinnitus distribution, and sensorineural hearing loss was retrieved. Studies that did not include data on hearing assessment were excluded. Relative frequencies were used for qualitative variables to compare different studies and to obtain average values. Genetic variants and genes were listed and clustered according to their potential role in tinnitus development.

resultsThe average prevalence of tinnitus estimated from population-based studies was 26.3% for any tinnitus, and 20% of patients with tinnitus reported it as an annoying symptom. One study has reported population-specific differences in the prevalence of tinnitus, the white ancestry being the population with a higher prevalence. Genome-wide association studies have identified and replicated two common variants in the Chinese population (rs2846071; rs4149577) in the intron of TNFRSF1A, associated with noise-induced tinnitus. Moreover, gene burden analyses in sequencing data from Spanish and Swede patients with severe tinnitus have identified and replicated ANK2, AKAP9, and TSC2 genes.

conclusionsThe genetic contribution to tinnitus is starting to be revealed and it shows population-specific effects in European and Asian populations. The common allelic variants associated with tinnitus that showed replication are associated with noise-induced tinnitus. Although severe tinnitus has been associated with rare variants with large effect, their role on hearing or hyperacusis has not been established.

Indexed as

Hearing Loss, SensorineuralTinnitusGenome-Wide Association StudyHearingHumansHyperacusisGeneticsGWASHeritabilityPrevalenceRare variationTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID38334885
PMCPMC10907330
OpenAlexW4391683417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.