Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38334881›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2025

Provider Use of, Attitudes Towards, and Self-efficacy with Key Measurement-based Care Practices in Youth Mental Health Treatment: A Multi-site Examination.

Amanda Jensen-Doss, Elizabeth Casline, Grace S Woodard, Dominique A Phillips, Elizabeth Lane, Tessa Palafu, Catherine Waye, Vanessa Ramirez, Daniel M Cheron, Kelsie Okamura

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amanda Jensen-DossDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA. ajensendoss@miami.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4995-7463
Elizabeth CaslineCenter for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, US.ORCID 0000-0001-9582-9249
Grace S WoodardDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6747-6914
Dominique A PhillipsDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Elizabeth LaneDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7345-4682
Tessa PalafuThe Baker Center for Children and Families, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-8069-864X
Catherine WayeThe Baker Center for Children and Families, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-3081-9648
Vanessa RamirezKristi House, Inc, Miami, FL, USA.
Daniel M CheronThe Baker Center for Children and Families, Boston, MA, USA.
Kelsie OkamuraThe Baker Center for Children and Families, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2910-5987

Funding

University of Miami University of Miami
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurement-based care (MBC) is an underutilized evidence-based practice, and current implementation efforts demonstrate limited success in increasing MBC use. A better understanding of MBC implementation determinants is needed to improve these efforts, particularly from studies examining the full range of MBC practices and that span multiple samples of diverse providers using different MBC systems. This study addressed these limitations by conducting a multi-site survey examining MBC predictors and use in youth treatment. Participants were 159 clinicians and care coordinators working in youth mental health care settings across the United States. Participants were drawn from three program evaluations of MBC implementation. Providers completed measures assessing use of five MBC practices (administering measures, viewing feedback, reviewing feedback in supervision, sharing feedback with clients in session, and using feedback to plan treatment), MBC self-efficacy, and MBC attitudes. Despite expectations that MBC should be standard care for all clients, providers reported only administering measures to 40-60% of clients on average, with practices related to the use of feedback falling in the 1-39% range. Higher MBC self-efficacy and more positive views of MBC practicality predicted higher MBC use, although other attitude measures were not significant predictors. Effects of predictors were not moderated by site, suggesting consistent predictors across implementation settings. Implications of study findings for future research and for the implementation of MBC are discussed.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMental Health ServicesSelf EfficacyAdolescentAdultEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedUnited StatesImplementation determinantsMeasurement-based careProvider attitudesProvider self-efficacyYouth mental health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.