Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38334830›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2024

[Characterization of atrial fibrillation burden using wearables].

Konstanze Betz, Dominik Linz, David Duncker, Henrike A K Hillmann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pre-procedural time spent in atrial fibrillation using intermittent ECG monitoring is associated with arrhythmia recurrence after ablation: the ISOLATION cohort study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Everyone over the age of 65 years should wear a smartwatch : Pro and contra].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2024
    Review
  5. Smartphone app-based approximation of time spent with atrial fibrillation and symptoms in patients after catheter ablation: data from the TeleCheck-AF project.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. [The challenge: specialization meets general medicine].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2024
    Article
  8. [eCardiology in cardiac electrophysiology].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Konstanze BetzDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, Niederlande. konstanze.betz@mumc.nl.
Dominik LinzDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER, Maastricht, Niederlande.
David DunckerHannover Herzrhythmus Centrum, Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.
Henrike A K HillmannHannover Herzrhythmus Centrum, Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The characterization of atrial fibrillation (AF) according to current guidelines categorically refers to the differentiation between paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent AF. A more precise characterization of AF, including the evaluation of AF burden, is playing an increasingly significant role in both scientific research and clinical practice. Digital devices, especially those with the capability of passive (semi-)continuous recording, can contribute to a more accurate quantification of AF burden. Particularly in patients with an already established diagnosis of AF, the evaluation of AF burden can be used to monitor the success of antiarrhythmic therapy including antiarrhythmic drugs or pulmonary vein isolation. However, important questions remain unanswered: In addition to a uniform, evidence-based definition of AF burden, clinically relevant cut-offs for AF burden and resulting therapeutic consequences (e.g., subclinical AF) need to be elaborated. Furthermore, the establishment and evaluation of care structures for assessing and integrating AF burden in clinical care, especially by incorporating data from wearable medical devices, should take place.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryWearable Electronic DevicesDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisEvidence-Based MedicineHumansReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity1‑channel ECGAtrial fibrillationDigital healthPhotoplethysmographyWearable electronic devices

Identifiers

PMID38334830
PMCPMC11161421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.