Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38334793›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2024

Increasing auditory intensity enhances temporal but deteriorates spatial accuracy in a virtual interception task.

J Walter Tolentino-Castro, Anna Schroeger, Rouwen Cañal-Bruland, Markus Raab

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J Walter Tolentino-CastroDepartment of Performance Psychology, Institute of Psychology, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-5571
Anna SchroegerDepartment for General Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9876-8322
Rouwen Cañal-BrulandDepartment for the Psychology of Human Movement and Sport, Institute of Sport Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7731-0934
Markus RaabDepartment of Performance Psychology, Institute of Psychology, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Cologne, Germany. raab@dshs-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6546-1666

Funding

DFG CA 635/2-2DFG RA 940/15-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans are quite accurate and precise in interception performance. So far, it is still unclear what role auditory information plays in spatiotemporal accuracy and consistency during interception. In the current study, interception performance was measured as the spatiotemporal accuracy and consistency of when and where a virtual ball was intercepted on a visible line displayed on a screen based on auditory information alone. We predicted that participants would more accurately indicate when the ball would cross a target line than where it would cross the line, because human hearing is particularly sensitive to temporal parameters. In a within-subject design, we manipulated auditory intensity (52, 61, 70, 79, 88 dB) using a sound stimulus programmed to be perceived over the screen in an inverted C-shape trajectory. Results showed that the louder the sound, the better was temporal accuracy, but the worse was spatial accuracy. We argue that louder sounds increased attention toward auditory information when performing interception judgments. How balls are intercepted and practically how intensity of sound may add to temporal accuracy and consistency is discussed from a theoretical perspective of modality-specific interception behavior.

Indexed as

HearingSoundAcoustic StimulationAttentionHandHumansAuditory stimuliIntensitySpatiotemporal accuracySpatiotemporal consistencyVirtual interception task

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.