Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38334652›Full record

ReviewCells2024

Recapitulation of Structure-Function-Regulation of Blood-Brain Barrier under (Patho)Physiological Conditions.

Hin Fong, Botao Zhou, Haixiao Feng, Chuoying Luo, Boren Bai, John Zhang, Yuechun Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. [Mechanisms and intervention strategies by which neuropsychological stress promotes central nervous system tumor recurrence through bloodZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hin FongFaculty of Medicine, International School, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.ORCID 0009-0008-4750-3568
Botao ZhouDepartment of Physiology, Basic Medical and Public Health School, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.ORCID 0009-0000-2759-7095
Haixiao FengGies College of Business, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-1269-2568
Chuoying LuoFaculty of Medicine, International School, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.ORCID 0009-0000-5627-3778
Boren BaiFaculty of Medicine, International School, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
John ZhangDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA.
Yuechun WangDepartment of Physiology, Basic Medical and Public Health School, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6491-6227
Jinan University · CNLoma Linda University · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Annual experimental teaching curriculum reform special project at Jinan University SYJG202202Curriculum Ideological and Political Construction project of Guangdong University Teaching Management Institute X-KCSZ2021003"Four new" experimental teaching curriculum reform project at Jinan University SYJG202201Higher education special project at Guangdong Province 2021GXJK259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a remarkable and intricate barrier that controls the exchange of molecules between the bloodstream and the brain. Its role in maintaining the stability of the central nervous system cannot be overstated. Over the years, advancements in neuroscience and technology have enabled us to delve into the cellular and molecular components of the BBB, as well as its regulation. Yet, there is a scarcity of comprehensive reviews that follow a logical framework of structure-function-regulation, particularly focusing on the nuances of BBB regulation under both normal and pathological conditions. This review sets out to address this gap by taking a historical perspective on the discovery of the BBB and highlighting the major observations that led to its recognition as a distinct brain barrier. It explores the intricate cellular elements contributing to the formation of the BBB, including endothelial cells, pericytes, astrocytes, and neurons, emphasizing their collective role in upholding the integrity and functionality of the BBB. Furthermore, the review delves into the dynamic regulation of the BBB in physiological states, encompassing neural, humoral, and auto-regulatory mechanisms. By shedding light on these regulatory processes, a deeper understanding of the BBB's response to various physiological cues emerges. This review also investigates the disruption of the BBB integrity under diverse pathological conditions, such as ischemia, infection, and toxin exposure. It elucidates the underlying mechanisms that contribute to BBB dysfunction and explores potential therapeutic strategies that aim to restore the BBB integrity and function. Overall, this recapitulation provides valuable insights into the structure, functions, and regulation of the BBB. By integrating historical perspectives, cellular elements, regulatory mechanisms, and pathological implications, this review contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of the BBB and paves the way for future research and therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierEndothelial CellsAstrocytesBrainCentral Nervous Systemblood–brain barrierdiseaseshealthintegrityregulation

Identifiers

PMID38334652
PMCPMC10854731
OpenAlexW4391362043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.