Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38334506›Full record

ReviewBrain : a journal of neurology2024

A neuroanatomical and cognitive model of impaired social behaviour in frontotemporal dementia.

Matthew A Rouse, Richard J Binney, Karalyn Patterson, James B Rowe, Matthew A Lambon Ralph

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Understanding the mind-brain relationship through focal neurodegenerative pathology.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  12. Destination memory in behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew A RouseMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.
Richard J BinneyCognitive Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2AS, UK.
Karalyn PattersonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1927-7424
James B RoweMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.
Matthew A Lambon RalphMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5907-2488
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBBangor University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T033371/1Medical Research Council SUAG/096 G116768NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre NIHR203312Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 220258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impaired social cognition is a core deficit in frontotemporal dementia (FTD). It is most commonly associated with the behavioural-variant of FTD, with atrophy of the orbitofrontal and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Social cognitive changes are also common in semantic dementia, with atrophy centred on the anterior temporal lobes. The impairment of social behaviour in FTD has typically been attributed to damage to the orbitofrontal cortex and/or temporal poles and/or the uncinate fasciculus that connects them. However, the relative contributions of each region are unresolved. In this review, we present a unified neurocognitive model of controlled social behaviour that not only explains the observed impairment of social behaviours in FTD, but also assimilates both consistent and potentially contradictory findings from other patient groups, comparative neurology and normative cognitive neuroscience. We propose that impaired social behaviour results from damage to two cognitively- and anatomically-distinct components. The first component is social-semantic knowledge, a part of the general semantic-conceptual system supported by the anterior temporal lobes bilaterally. The second component is social control, supported by the orbitofrontal cortex, medial frontal cortex and ventrolateral frontal cortex, which interacts with social-semantic knowledge to guide and shape social behaviour.

Indexed as

Frontotemporal DementiaSocial BehaviorCognitionHumansSocial Cognitionanterior temporal lobefrontotemporal dementiaorbitofrontal cortexsemantic dementiasocial controlsocial-semantic knowledge

Identifiers

PMID38334506
PMCPMC11146431
OpenAlexW4391683349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.