Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38333897›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2024

Dupilumab Treatment in Pediatric Patients Aged 6-11 Years with Severe Atopic Dermatitis Whose Disease Is Not Adequately Controlled: A Review.

Michael J Cork, Simon G Danby, Ana B Rossi, Ashish Bansal

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael J CorkSheffield Dermatology Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Simon G DanbySheffield Dermatology Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ana B RossiSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ashish BansalRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, NY, USA.
Regeneron (United States) · USSanofi (United States) · USSheffield Children's Hospital · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory skin disease in children. Children with severe AD have a multidimensional disease burden characterized by skin lesions, itching, frequent infections, sleep deprivation, and a high rate of comorbidities. These impact the mental health and overall quality of life of not only the children but also of their parents and caregivers. There are few effective available treatment options for young children with severe AD that are suitable for long-term use. Due to their adverse effects, practice guidelines consider systemic agents inappropriate for this age group, although they are still used off-label in extreme cases. The biologic dupilumab has recently been approved for children aged 6-11 years with severe (EU) and moderate-to-severe (USA) AD, offering hope to this population of patients with a high unmet clinical need. The purpose of this review is to describe the unmet needs of AD patients aged 6-11 years prior to dupilumab approval and to summarize existing clinical data supporting dupilumab's safety and efficacy in these children.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedChildChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodHumansQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizeddupilumabatopic dermatitischildrendupilumabpediatricsevere

Identifiers

PMID38333897
PMCPMC10849907
OpenAlexW4391485718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.