Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38333892›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Prototyping the implementation of a suicide prevention protocol in primary care settings using PDSA cycles: a mixed method study.

Nadia Minian, Allison Gayapersad, Adina Coroiu, Rosa Dragonetti, Laurie Zawertailo, Juveria Zaheer, Braden O'Neill, Shannon Lange, Nicole Thomson, Allison Crawford and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Sociology of Suicide After COVID-19: Assessment of the Spanish Case.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nadia MinianINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Allison GayapersadINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Adina CoroiuINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rosa DragonettiINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Laurie ZawertailoINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Juveria ZaheerInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Braden O'NeillDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shannon LangeInstitute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nicole ThomsonInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Allison CrawfordINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sidney H KennedyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter SelbyINTREPID Lab, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In Canada, approximately 4,500 individuals die by suicide annually. Approximately 45% of suicide decedents had contact with their primary care provider within the month prior to their death. Current versus never smokers have an 81% increased risk of death by suicide. Those who smoke have additional risks for suicide such as depression, chronic pain, alcohol, and other substance use. They are more likely to experience adverse social determinants of health. Taken together, this suggests that smoking cessation programs in primary care could be facilitators of suicide prevention, but this has not been studied. Study objectives: The objectives of the study are to understand barriers/facilitators to implementing a suicide prevention protocol within a smoking cessation program (STOP program), which is deployed by an academic mental health and addiction treatment hospital in primary care clinics and to develop and test implementation strategies to facilitate the uptake of suicide screening and assessment in primary care clinics across Ontario. Methods: The study employed a three-phase sequential mixed-method design. Phase 1: Conducted interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research exploring barriers to implementing a suicide prevention protocol. Phase 2: Performed consensus discussions to map barriers to implementation strategies using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change tool Results: Eleven healthcare providers and four research assistants identified lack of training and the need of better educational materials as implementation barriers. Participants endorsed and tested the top three ranked implementation strategies, namely, a webinar, adding a preamble before depression survey questions, and an infographic. After participating in the webinar and reviewing the educational materials, all participants endorsed the three strategies as Conclusion: Although there are barriers to implementing a suicide prevention protocol within primary care, it is possible to overcome them with strategies deemed both acceptable and feasible. These results offer promising practice solutions to implement a suicide prevention protocol in smoking cessation programs delivered in primary care settings. Future efforts should track implementation of these strategies and measure outcomes, including provider confidence, self-efficacy, and knowledge, and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

CFIRERICimplementationPDSAprimary caresuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID38333892
PMCPMC10850298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.