ArticleHeliyon2024
Concrete incorporating supplementary cementitious materials: Temporal evolution of compressive strength and environmental life cycle assessment.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Strength and Post-Peak Ductility in Sustainable Concretes: The Synergy of Silica Fume and Nano-Silica with Class F Fly Ash.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Synergistic enhancement of strength and durability in self-healing concrete using treated pineapple fibres and bacterial mineralization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Performance assessment of medical waste incineration ash as partial cement replacement in concrete: Bangladesh perspective.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Influence of bentonite, silica fume, and polypropylene fibers on green concrete for pavement and structural durability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Structural and environmental impacts of concrete quality a comparative life cycle assessment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Determination of Fracture Mechanic Parameters of Concretes Based on Cement Matrix Enhanced by Fly Ash and Nano-Silica.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs) or industrial wastes as a partial replacement for cement in the production of concrete is an urgent need in the construction industry due to cement's growing environmental challenges and rising cost. In respect of this, we conducted research work on proportioning binary concrete mixes. Fly ash (FA) replaced 10 %, 20 %, and 30 % of the cement, while silica fume (SF) replaced 5 %, 10 %, and 15 % of the cement. A control concrete mix was also developed with 100 % cement and no SCM. The results showed no increase in compressive strength for FA concrete compared to control at the early age of 3-28 days, but a maximum increase in compressive strength of 4 % was discovered at a later age of 56 days for concrete with 20 % FA. For 5 % SF concrete, a considerable strength increase of 15 % was seen at the early age of 3 days. Like with FA concrete, 2 % improvement in strength was recorded at the later age of 56 days for 10 % SF concrete. This study further focused on the concrete's temporal evolution of compressive strength by developing a strength evolution model (SEM) using nonlinear regression analysis at a 95 % confidence level. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between the model values and the experimental results. For comparison, the fib Model Code 2010 was applied to the experimental data, and a good agreement was observed among the proposed model, the fib Model values, and the experimental results. The proposed model can be expanded to address further regression-related problems. Finally, environmental life cycle assessment revealed that utilizing 10 %, 20 %, and 30 % of FA lowered Global Warming Potential (GWP) by 9 %, 19 %, and 29 %, respectively. Likewise, using 5 %, 10 %, and 15 % of SF reduced the GWP by 5 %, 9 %, and 14 %.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.