Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38333818›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A soft voting ensemble learning approach for credit card fraud detection.

Mimusa Azim Mim, Nazia Majadi, Peal Mazumder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mimusa Azim MimDepartment of Computer Science and Telecommunication Engineering, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali-3814, Bangladesh.
Nazia MajadiDepartment of Computer Science and Telecommunication Engineering, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali-3814, Bangladesh.
Peal MazumderDepartment of Computer Science and Telecommunication Engineering, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali-3814, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advancement of e-commerce and modern technological development, credit cards are widely used for both online and offline purchases, which has increased the number of daily fraudulent transactions. Many organizations and financial institutions worldwide lose billions of dollars annually because of credit card fraud. Due to the global distribution of both legitimate and fraudulent transactions, it is difficult to discern between the two. Furthermore, because only a small proportion of transactions are fraudulent, there is a problem of class imbalance. Hence, an effective fraud-detection methodology is required to sustain the reliability of the payment system. Machine learning has recently emerged as a viable substitute for identifying this type of fraud. However, ML approaches have difficulty identifying fraud with high prediction accuracy, while also decreasing misclassification costs due to the size of the imbalanced data. In this research, a soft voting ensemble learning approach for detecting credit card fraud on imbalanced data is proposed. To do this, the proposed approach is evaluated and compared with numerous sophisticated sampling techniques (i.e., oversampling, undersampling, and hybrid sampling) to overcome the class imbalance problem. We develop several credit card fraud classifiers, including ensemble classifiers, with and without sampling techniques. According to the experimental results, the proposed soft-voting approach outperforms individual classifiers. With a false negative rate (FNR) of 0.0306, it achieves a precision of 0.9870, recall of 0.9694, f1-score of 0.8764, and AUROC of 0.9936.

Indexed as

Credit card fraudEnsemble learning techniquesHybrid samplingOver-samplingSoft voting approachUnder-sampling

Identifiers

PMID38333818
PMCPMC10850588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.